Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20731990›Full record

ReviewAdvances in protein chemistry and structural biology2008

Chapter 3. High-throughput protein purification for x-ray crystallography and NMR.

Youngchang Kim, Lance Bigelow, Maria Borovilos, Irina Dementieva, Erika Duggan, William Eschenfeldt, Catherine Hatzos, Grazyna Joachimiak, Hui Li, Natalia Maltseva and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in protein chemistry and structural biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Crystal structures of the components of the Staphylococcus aureus leukotoxin ED.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Youngchang KimMidwest Center for Structural Genomics and Structural Biology Center, Biosciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA.
Lance Bigelow
Maria Borovilos
Irina Dementieva
Erika Duggan
William Eschenfeldt
Catherine Hatzos
Grazyna Joachimiak
Hui Li
Natalia Maltseva
Rory Mulligan
Pearl Quartey
Alicia Sather
Lucy Stols
Lour Volkart
Ruiying Wu
Min Zhou
Andrzej Joachimiak
Argonne National Laboratory · USJoint Center for Structural Genomics · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

The Midwest Center for Structural GenomicsU54GM074942 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI JOACHIMIAK, ANDRZEJ · 2005 to 2009
$51.0M
THE MIDWEST CENTER FOR STRUCTURAL GENOMICSP50GM062414 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI JOACHIMIAK, ANDRZEJ JOACHIMIAK · 2000 to 2004
$33.2M
NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200700058CNIGMS NIH HHS GM074942NIGMS NIH HHS GM62414NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM062414NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM074942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In structural biology, the most critical issue is the availability of high-quality samples. "Structural-biology-grade" proteins must be generated in a quantity and quality suitable for structure determination using X-ray crystallography or nuclear magnetic resonance. The additional challenge for structural genomics is the need for high numbers of proteins at low cost where protein targets quite often have low sequence similarities, unknown properties and are poorly characterized. The purification procedures must reproducibly yield homogeneous proteins or their derivatives containing marker atom(s) in milligram quantities. The choice of protein purification and handling procedures plays a critical role in obtaining high-quality protein samples. Where the ultimate goal of structural biology is the same-to understand the structural basis of proteins in cellular processes, the structural genomics approach is different in that the functional aspects of individual protein or family are not ignored, however, emphasis here is on the number of unique structures, covering most of the protein folding space and developing new technologies with high efficiency. At the Midwest Center Structural Genomics (MCSG), we have developed semiautomated protocols for high-throughput parallel protein purification. In brief, a protein, expressed as a fusion with a cleavable affinity tag, is purified in two immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) steps: (i) first IMAC coupled with buffer-exchange step, and after tag cleavage using TEV protease, (ii) second IMAC and buffer exchange to clean up cleaved tags and tagged TEV protease. Size exclusion chromatography is also applied as needed. These protocols have been implemented on multidimensional chromatography workstations AKTAexplorer and AKTAxpress (GE Healthcare). All methods and protocols used for purification, some developed in MCSG, others adopted and integrated into the MCSG purification pipeline and more recently the Center for Structural Genomics of Infectious Disease (CSGID) purification pipeline, are discussed in this chapter.

Indexed as

Crystallography, X-RayMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyChemical FractionationModels, MolecularProtein FoldingProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID20731990
PMCPMC3366499
OpenAlexW1506290062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.