Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20731977›Full record

Trial reportJournal of studies on alcohol and drugs2010

Evaluation of an electronic clinical reminder to facilitate brief alcohol-counseling interventions in primary care.

Emily C Williams, Carol E Achtmeyer, Daniel R Kivlahan, Diane Greenberg, Joseph O Merrill, Thomas M Wickizer, Thomas D Koepsell, Patrick J Heagerty, Katharine A Bradley

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. A clinical practice guide: What HIV care providers need to know about HIV pregnancy planning to optimize preconception care for their patients.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emily C WilliamsHealth Services Research and Development and Center of Excellence in Substance Abuse Treatment and Education, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, 1100 Olive Way, Suite 1400, Seattle, Washington 98101, USA. emily.williams3@va.gov
Carol E Achtmeyer
Daniel R Kivlahan
Diane Greenberg
Joseph O Merrill
Thomas M Wickizer
Thomas D Koepsell
Patrick J Heagerty
Katharine A Bradley

Funding

EFFECTIVENESS OF PRIMARY CARE ALCOHOL INTERVENTIONSK23AA000313 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BRADLEY, KATHARINE ANTHONY · 2000 to 2004
$636k
NIAAA NIH HHS K23 AA000313NIAAA NIH HHS K23AA00313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBrief intervention for patients with unhealthy alcohol use is a prevention priority in the United States, but most eligible patients do not receive it. This study evaluated an electronic alcohol-counseling clinical reminder at a single Veterans Affairs general medicine clinic.

methodThe systems-level intervention evaluated in this study consisted of making the clinical reminder, which facilitated medical record documentation of brief intervention among patients who screened positive for unhealthy alcohol use, available to providers on one (of two) randomly selected hallways. Secondary electronic data were extracted for all patients who visited the clinic (October 1, 2002, to September 30, 2005). The proportion of patients with clinical-reminder use was evaluated among patients who screened positive for unhealthy drinking and were assigned to intervention hallway providers ("descriptive cohort"). Adjusted logistic regression evaluated the association between the intervention and resolution of unhealthy drinking at follow-up among all screen-positive patients who completed a second Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test Consumption questionnaire 18 months or longer after the first ("outcomes cohort").

resultsEligible patients (N= 22,863) included 10,392 controls and 12,471 in the intervention group. Fifteen percent (398 of 2,640) of descriptive cohort patients with unhealthy drinking had clinical-reminder use, which varied by severity (14% [n = 302 of 2,165] with mild/moderate and 20% [n = 96 of 475] with severe unhealthy drinking,p = .001). Only 39% (156 of 398) of patients with clinical-reminder use had documented brief intervention; advice to abstain was most common. Access to the clinical reminder was not significantly associated with resolution of unhealthy drinking in 1,358 patients in the outcomes cohort.

conclusionsAvailability of a clinical reminder to facilitate brief intervention did not, alone, result in substantial use of the clinical reminder. More active implementation efforts may be needed to get brief interventions onto the agenda of busy primary care providers.

Indexed as

AgedAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholismCohort StudiesDirective CounselingElectronic MailHospitals, VeteransHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareReminder SystemsSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID20731977
PMCPMC2930502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.