Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20731674›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental immunology2010

Characterization of long-term mixed donor-donor chimerism after double cord blood transplantation.

J Gertow, S Berglund, M Okas, M Uzunel, L Berg, K Kärre, J Mattsson, M Uhlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. How to Improve Cord Blood Engraftment?Frontiers in medicine · 2016
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

J GertowCentre for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation and Division of Clinical Immunology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. jens.gertow@ki.se
S Berglund
M Okas
M Uzunel
L Berg
K Kärre
J Mattsson
M Uhlin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Double cord blood transplantation (DCBT) with two matched or partially matched cord blood units has been implemented successfully to circumvent the limitations of graft cell dose associated with single CBT. After DCBT, sustained haematopoiesis is derived almost exclusively from only one of the donated units. None the less, we previously observed two of six evaluable DCBT patients still having mixed donor-donor chimerism at 28 and 45 months post-transplantation, respectively. In the present study we utilize flow cytometry techniques to perform the first thorough analysis of phenotype and functionality of cord blood units in patients with mixed donor-donor chimerism. Our results suggest that the two stable cord blood units are different phenotypically and functionally: one unit shows more naive T cells, lower T cell cytokine production and higher frequencies of natural killer cells, the other shows higher frequencies of well-differentiated and functional lymphocytes. Additionally, in comparison with control patients having a single prevailing cord blood unit, the patients with donor-donor chimerism exhibit less overall T cell cytokine production and a smaller fraction of memory T cells. Furthermore, our results indicate that human leucocyte antigen-C match of donor units may partly explain the development of a donor-donor mixed chimerism.

Indexed as

Tissue DonorsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCells, CulturedCord Blood Stem Cell TransplantationFlow CytometryHematopoiesisHumansImmunologic MemoryInterferon-gammaInterleukin-2K562 CellsKiller Cells, NaturalLymphocyte ActivationMitogensTime FactorsInterferon-gammaInterleukin-2MitogensTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID20731674
PMCPMC2990940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.