ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy1990
Improvement of amphotericin B activity during experimental cryptococcosis by incorporation into specific immunoliposomes.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1990. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing efficacy of Amphotericin B through nanomodification.International journal of nanomedicine · 2007Review
- Optimizing efficacy of amphotericin B through nanomodification.International journal of nanomedicine · 2006Review
- Biopharmaceutical aspects of lipid formulations of amphotericin B.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 1997Review
- Carrier effects on biological activity of amphotericin B.Clinical microbiology reviews · 1996Review
- Treatment of systemic candidiasis in a neutropenic murine model using immunoglobulin G bearing liposomal amphotericin B.Mycopathologia · 1993Article
- Molecular characterization of the humoral responses to Cryptococcus neoformans infection and glucuronoxylomannan-tetanus toxoid conjugate immunization.The Journal of experimental medicine · 1993Article
- Protective murine monoclonal antibodies to Cryptococcus neoformans.Infection and immunity · 1992Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cryptococcosis is an opportunistic infection that is responsible for increased morbidity and mortality in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. The high toxicity of the antifungal agent that is mainly used against cryptococcosis, amphotericin B (AMB), accounts for the need for new treatments, especially in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome because of the high relapse rate of cryptococcosis. Drug targeting may be one of these alternate treatments. Since we have demonstrated that an immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) anti-Cryptococcus neoformans serotype A monoclonal antibody (E1) was protective during experimental cryptococcosis in mice, we investigated whether specific targeting of AMB with liposomes that bear E1 would improve the therapeutic index of the drug. For that purpose, in vitro and in vivo experiments were designed to compare the specificities and activities of these liposomes with those of control immunoliposomes bearing a nonrelated IgG1 monoclonal antibody (CY34). The immunoliposomes were prepared by covalently linking E1 or CY34 and small unilamellar vesicles. When immunoliposomes were incubated with yeast cells, only E1-bearing liposomes recognized C. neoformans. In vivo, mice that were treated 24 h after infection with one injection of AMB (0.12 mg/kg of body weight) intercalated into E1-bearing liposomes survived significantly longer than did those given the same dose of AMB alone or AMB intercalated into nontargeted liposomes or control immunoliposomes. None of the mice that were given control treatments did statistically better than those that were given AMB. Keeping in mind that this kind of therapy requires knowledge of the antigenic type of the infecting organism, the results suggest that specific targeting of small doses of AMB improve the efficacy of AMB and might be an alternative to the use of larger doses of AMB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.