Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20730562›Full record

ArticleNeurochemical research2010

Astrocytic responses to DNA delivery using nucleofection.

H Muyderman, W P Yew, B Homkajorn, N R Sims

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurochemical research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

H MuydermanCentre for Neuroscience, Flinders Medical Science and Technology, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia. hakan.muyderman@flinders.edu.au
W P Yew
B Homkajorn
N R Sims

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleofection is a powerful non-viral transfection technique that can deliver plasmid DNA with high efficiency to cells that are traditionally difficult to transfect. In this study, we demonstrate that nucleofection of astrocytes grown in primary cell culture resulted in 76 ± 9% transfected cells and low cytotoxicity. However, the nucleofected astrocytes showed a reduced re-attachment to the growth media when replated and subsequent impairment of proliferation. This led to substantially decreased cell densities during the initial 72 h following transfection. Furthermore, these cells were less efficient at producing wound closure in a scratch model of injury. Nucleofection also resulted in the generation of a small proportion of polynucleated cells. The findings demonstrate that nucleofection provides a valuable technique for delivering DNA to astrocytes in culture. However, considerable care is needed in designing and interpreting such studies because of long-lasting changes induced in key properties of these cells by the nucleofection process.

Indexed as

AnimalsAstrocytesCell ProliferationDNAElectroporationGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTransfectionWound HealingDNAGlial Fibrillary Acidic Protein

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.