Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20730473›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2010

A review of malignant meningiomas: diagnosis, characteristics, and treatment.

Simon Hanft, Peter Canoll, Jeffrey N Bruce

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Simon HanftDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA. sihanft@gmail.com
Peter Canoll
Jeffrey N Bruce

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaplastic or malignant meningiomas (WHO Grade III) represent the most rare but aggressive subtype, accounting for 1-3% of all intracranial meningiomas. Due in large part to their scarcity, malignant meningiomas have been understudied and therefore represent an area where significant clinical advances may be made. To this point, our understanding of the genetic and histologic attributes of these lesions has grown, though the management and treatment of these aggressive tumors is less well elucidated and thus has room for further study. In this review, we describe the current understanding of malignant meningiomas in terms of their genetic alterations and unique histologic markers. Using this as a foundation, we will then discuss the current therapeutic strategies for managing these lesions and the future direction that such interventions may take.

Indexed as

HumansMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningioma

Identifiers

PMID20730473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.