Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20729251›Full record

ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2010

Successful clinical trial research in nursing homes: the Improving Decision-Making Study.

Laura C Hanson, Robin Gilliam, Tae Joon Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Palliative care interventions in advanced dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Palliative care interventions in advanced dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. The triple challenge of recruiting older adults with dementia and high medical acuity in skilled nursing facilities.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2013
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Development and evaluation of a sleep education program for older adults with dementia living in adult family homes.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2012
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Sampling challenges in nursing home research.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura C HansonDivision of Geriatric Medicine and Palliative Care Program, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7550, USA. lhanson@med.unc.edu
Robin Gilliam
Tae Joon Lee

Funding

Improving Decision-Making about Feeding Options for Dementia PatientsR01NR009826 · NINR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HANSON, LAURA C · 2006 to 2009
$1.6M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR009826
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne in four Americans, and 70% of people who have dementia, will spend their final days in nursing home care. Clinical research, particularly clinical trials, rarely includes this population due to unique challenges in research methods and ethics. Families of advanced dementia patients make choices about tube feeding and other feeding options with limited access to information or communication. The cluster randomized trial, Improving Decision Making about Feeding Options for Dementia Patients, tests a decision aid intervention to improve the quality of decision making for this choice. PURPOSE: Our objectives are (1) to describe the methods used in this trial; (2) to describe challenges and strategies for effective nursing home and nursing home resident recruitment and retention; and (3) to describe research ethics approaches to minimize harms and maximize benefits for this population.

methodsThe study is a cluster randomized trial of a decision aid to inform and support the choice between tube feeding and assisted oral feeding in advanced dementia. Study subjects are paired surrogate decision makers and residents with advanced dementia and feeding problems, enrolled from nursing homes in North Carolina.

resultsThis trial enrolled 256 paired surrogate decision makers and residents in 24 nursing home sites, and 99% completed participation through the 3-month study period. The research team had prior clinical and investigative experience in this setting, and used multiple strategies to recruit and retain nursing home sites, providers, surrogates, and the residents for whom they spoke. Informed consent and human subjects' protections were designed to address the vulnerability of this population. LIMITATIONS: Cluster randomization was necessary to avoid contamination between control and intervention subjects, but may introduce confounding by site and intracluster correlation effects in analyses.

conclusionsStrategies that facilitate nursing home recruitment, participant recruitment and protection of human subjects for a vulnerable population may be used by future investigators to expand the research evidence base for nursing home and dementia care.

Indexed as

Cluster AnalysisDecision MakingAgedBiomedical ResearchClinical Trials as TopicDecision Support TechniquesDementiaEnteral NutritionFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleNorth CarolinaNursing HomesPatient SelectionPsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID20729251
PMCPMC4384049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.