Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20729130›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2010

Coupled motions in enzyme catalysis.

Vishal C Nashine, Sharon Hammes-Schiffer, Stephen J Benkovic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ratcheting synthesis.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Protein Dynamics and Enzymatic Catalysis.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2023
    Review
  17. Temporal and spatial resolution of distal protein motions that activate hydrogen tunneling in soybean lipoxygenase.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vishal C NashineDepartment of Chemistry, The Pennsylvania State University, 414 Wartik Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Sharon Hammes-Schiffer
Stephen J Benkovic

Funding

Simulation of Proton and Hydride Transfer in EnzymesR37GM056207 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HAMMES-SCHIFFER, SHARON · 2011 to 2020
$3.2M
SIMULATION OF PROTON AND HYDRIDE TRANSFER IN ENZYMESR01GM056207 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI HAMMES-SCHIFFER, SHARON · 1998 to 2010
$2.7M
Dynamic Properties that Enhance Enzyme FunctionR01GM092946 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI HECHT, SIDNEY M. · 2010 to 2013
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM092946NIGMS NIH HHS GM56207NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM056207NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM092946NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM056207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, the hypothesis that protein motions are involved in enzymatic turnover has gained significant attention. We review cases where there is evidence that protein motions are rate-limiting in the overall catalytic cycle and examine experimental and theoretical evidence for how such motions enhance the probability of sampling the transition state configurations relative to the ground state. The impact of tunneling, the possible role of vibrational coupling and the value of conformational chemical landscapes are also scrutinized.

Indexed as

BiocatalysisMovementEnzymesHumansKineticsMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMolecular Dynamics SimulationEnzymes

Identifiers

PMID20729130
PMCPMC2953590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.