ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2010
The DBCLS BioHackathon: standardization and interoperability for bioinformatics web services and workflows. The DBCLS BioHackathon Consortium*.
Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards a comprehensive assessment of QSP models: what would it take?Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2024Review
- Ten simple rules to run a successful BioHackathon.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- BioHackathon 2015: Semantics of data for life sciences and reproducible research.F1000Research · 2020Article
- Next generation community assessment of biomedical entity recognition web servers: metrics, performance, interoperability aspects of BeCalm.Journal of cheminformatics · 2019Article
- NBDC RDF portal: a comprehensive repository for semantic data in life sciences.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018Article
- FALDO: a semantic standard for describing the location of nucleotide and protein feature annotation.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2016Article
- Clinical decision support systems for improving diagnostic accuracy and achieving precision medicine.Journal of clinical bioinformatics · 2015Article
- BioHackathon series in 2011 and 2012: penetration of ontology and linked data in life science domains.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2014Article
- G-Links: a gene-centric link acquisition service.F1000Research · 2014Article
- Community-driven development for computational biology at Sprints, Hackathons and Codefests.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- A digital repository with an extensible data model for biobanking and genomic analysis management.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Enriched biodiversity data as a resource and service.Biodiversity data journal · 2014Article
- Protein Data Bank Japan (PDBj): maintaining a structural data archive and resource description framework format.Nucleic acids research · 2012Article
- The use of glycoinformatics in glycochemistry.Beilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2012Article
- The 2nd DBCLS BioHackathon: interoperable bioinformatics Web services for integrated applications.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
57 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Web services have become a key technology for bioinformatics, since life science databases are globally decentralized and the exponential increase in the amount of available data demands for efficient systems without the need to transfer entire databases for every step of an analysis. However, various incompatibilities among database resources and analysis services make it difficult to connect and integrate these into interoperable workflows. To resolve this situation, we invited domain specialists from web service providers, client software developers, Open Bio* projects, the BioMoby project and researchers of emerging areas where a standard exchange data format is not well established, for an intensive collaboration entitled the BioHackathon 2008. The meeting was hosted by the Database Center for Life Science (DBCLS) and Computational Biology Research Center (CBRC) and was held in Tokyo from February 11th to 15th, 2008. In this report we highlight the work accomplished and the common issues arisen from this event, including the standardization of data exchange formats and services in the emerging fields of glycoinformatics, biological interaction networks, text mining, and phyloinformatics. In addition, common shared object development based on BioSQL, as well as technical challenges in large data management, asynchronous services, and security are discussed. Consequently, we improved interoperability of web services in several fields, however, further cooperation among major database centers and continued collaborative efforts between service providers and software developers are still necessary for an effective advance in bioinformatics web service technologies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.