Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20727155›Full record

ArticleTheoretical biology & medical modelling2010

Dynamic models of immune responses: what is the ideal level of detail?

Juilee Thakar, Mary Poss, Réka Albert, Gráinne H Long, Ranran Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Theoretical biology & medical modelling, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Computational Nosology and Precision Psychiatry.Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Boolean Modeling of Cellular and Molecular Pathways Involved in Influenza Infection.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juilee ThakarCenter for Infectious Disease Dynamics and Department of Physics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. jthakar@phys.psu.edu
Mary Poss
Réka Albert
Gráinne H Long
Ranran Zhang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the goals of computational immunology is to facilitate the study of infectious diseases. Dynamic modeling is a powerful tool to integrate empirical data from independent sources, make novel predictions, and to foresee the gaps in the current knowledge. Dynamic models constructed to study the interactions between pathogens and hosts' immune responses have revealed key regulatory processes in the infection. OPTIMUM COMPLEXITY AND DYNAMIC MODELING: We discuss the usability of various deterministic dynamic modeling approaches to study the progression of infectious diseases. The complexity of these models is dependent on the number of components and the temporal resolution in the model. We comment on the specific use of simple and complex models in the study of the progression of infectious diseases.

conclusionsModels of sub-systems or simplified immune response can be used to hypothesize phenomena of host-pathogen interactions and to estimate rates and parameters. Nevertheless, to study the pathogenesis of an infection we need to develop models describing the dynamics of the immune components involved in the progression of the disease. Incorporation of the large number and variety of immune processes involved in pathogenesis requires tradeoffs in modeling.

Indexed as

Models, ImmunologicalAnimalsImmunityInfections

Identifiers

PMID20727155
PMCPMC2933642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.