Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20727149›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2010

Arm-in-cage testing of natural human-derived mosquito repellents.

James G Logan, Nina M Stanczyk, Ahmed Hassanali, Joshua Kemei, Antônio E G Santana, Karlos A L Ribeiro, John A Pickett, A Jennifer Mordue Luntz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Making scents of mosquito repellents.Trends in parasitology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cyclic Acetals as Novel Long-Lasting Mosquito Repellents.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

James G LoganBiological Chemistry Department, Centre for Sustainable Pest and Disease Management, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, UK. james.logan@bbsrc.ac.uk
Nina M Stanczyk
Ahmed Hassanali
Joshua Kemei
Antônio E G Santana
Karlos A L Ribeiro
John A Pickett
A Jennifer Mordue Luntz
Rothamsted Research · GBUniversidade Federal de Alagoas · BRInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology · KEKenyatta University · KE

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividual human subjects are differentially attractive to mosquitoes and other biting insects. Previous investigations have demonstrated that this can be attributed partly to enhanced production of natural repellent chemicals by those individuals that attract few mosquitoes in the laboratory. The most important compounds in this respect include three aldehydes, octanal, nonanal and decanal, and two ketones, 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one and geranylacetone [(E)-6,10-dimethylundeca-5,9-dien-2-one]. In olfactometer trials, these compounds interfered with attraction of mosquitoes to a host and consequently show promise as novel mosquito repellents.

methodsTo test whether these chemicals could provide protection against mosquitoes, laboratory repellency trials were carried out to test the chemicals individually at different concentrations and in different mixtures and ratios with three major disease vectors: Anopheles gambiae, Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes aegypti.

resultsUp to 100% repellency was achieved depending on the type of repellent compound tested, the concentration and the relative composition of the mixture. The greatest effect was observed by mixing together two compounds, 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one and geranylacetone in a 1:1 ratio. This mixture exceeded the repellency of DEET when presented at low concentrations. The repellent effect of this mixture was maintained over several hours. Altering the ratio of these compounds significantly affected the behavioural response of the mosquitoes, providing evidence for the ability of mosquitoes to detect and respond to specific mixtures and ratios of natural repellent compounds that are associated with host location.

conclusionThe optimum mixture of 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one and geranylacetone was a 1:1 ratio and this provided the most effective protection against all species of mosquito tested. With further improvements in formulation, selected blends of these compounds have the potential to be exploited and developed as human-derived novel repellents for personal protection.

Indexed as

AedesAldehydesAnimalsAnophelesArmCulicidaeHumansInsect Bites and StingsInsect RepellentsInsect VectorsKetonesMosquito ControlAldehydesInsect RepellentsKetones

Identifiers

PMID20727149
PMCPMC2931528
OpenAlexW2141978974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.