SynthesisJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2010
Assessing enablement in clinical practice: a systematic review of available instruments.
Synthesis in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Patient and public engagement in research and health system decision making: A systematic review of evaluation tools.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018Pooled it
- Identification, description and appraisal of generic PROMs for primary care: a systematic review.BMC family practice · 2018Pooled it
- Measuring patients' perceptions of patient-centered care: a systematic review of tools for family medicine.Annals of family medicinePooled it
- Patient enablement and health-related quality of life for patients with chronic back and knee pain: a cross-sectional study in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023Article
- Enablement and empowerment among patients participating in a supported osteoarthritis self-management programme - a prospective observational study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Observational
- The validity and reliability of the patient enablement instrument (PEI) after GP appointments in Finnish health care centres.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2020Article
- Towards a taxonomy of behavior change techniques for promoting shared decision making.Implementation science : IS · 2020Article
- Coping better with health problems after a visit to the family physician: associations with patients and physicians characteristics.BMC family practice · 2018Article
- Physician Enabling Skills Questionnaire: Validation of a newly developed instrument in primary health care.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2015Article
- Antenatal care strengthening for improved quality of care in Jimma, Ethiopia: an effectiveness study.BMC public health · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RATIONALE, AIMS AND
objectivesEnablement is an intervention by which the health care provider recognizes, promotes and enhances patients' ability to control their health and life. An abundant health literature suggests that enablement is associated with good outcomes. In this review, we aimed at identifying and comparing instruments that assess enablement in the health care context.
methodWe conducted a systematic literature review using Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Cinahl and PsycINFO databases, 1980 through March 2009, with specific search strategy for each database. Citations were included if they reported: (1) development and/or validation of an instrument; (2) evaluation of enablement in a health care context; and (3) quantitative results following administration of the instrument. The quality of each main retained citation was assessed using a modified version of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy.
resultsOf 3135 citations identified, 53 were retrieved for detailed evaluation. Four articles were included. Two instruments were found: the Patient Empowerment Scale (PES) and the Empowering Speech Practices Scale (ESPS). Both instruments assessed enablement in hospital setting, one from the inpatient's perspective (PES) and the other from both perspectives (ESPS).
conclusionTwo instruments assess enablement in hospital setting. No instrument is currently available to assess enablement in an ambulatory care context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.