Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20725766›Full record

ReviewGenetica2011

Safe and fit genetically modified insects for pest control: from lab to field applications.

F Scolari, P Siciliano, P Gabrieli, L M Gomulski, A Bonomi, G Gasperi, A R Malacrida

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Genetica, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

F ScolariDepartment of Animal Biology, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
P Siciliano
P Gabrieli
L M Gomulski
A Bonomi
G Gasperi
A R Malacrida

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insect transgenesis is continuously being improved to increase the efficacy of population suppression and replacement strategies directed to the control of insect species of economic and sanitary interest. An essential prerequisite for the success of both pest control applications is that the fitness of the transformant individuals is not impaired, so that, once released in the field, they can efficiently compete with or even out-compete their wild-type counterparts for matings in order to reduce the population size, or to spread desirable genes into the target population. Recent research has shown that the production of fit and competitive transformants can now be achieved and that transgenes may not necessarily confer a fitness cost. In this article we review the most recent published results of the fitness assessment of different transgenic insect lines and underline the necessity to fulfill key requirements of ecological safety. Fitness evaluation studies performed in field cages and medium/large-scale rearing will validate the present encouraging laboratory results, giving an indication of the performance of the transgenic insect genotype after release in pest control programmes.

Indexed as

Genetic FitnessAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedGene Transfer TechniquesInsectaInsect ControlPopulation Dynamics

Identifiers

PMID20725766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.