ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2011
Follow-up after intraoperative sentinel node biopsy of N0 neck oral cancer patients.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Sentinel node biopsy versus elective neck dissection in early-stage oral cancer: a systematic review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Diagnostic value of sentinel lymph node biopsy for cT1/T2N0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2017Pooled it
- Diagnostic Efficacy of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of 66 Studies.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Diagnostic value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2013Pooled it
- Frozen Section Analysis of Sentinel Nodes in Patients With Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2024Article
- A Systematic Review of Oral Biopsies, Sample Types, and Detection Techniques Applied in Relation to Oral Cancer Detection.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2022Review
- Management of the Neck in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2019Article
- Additional non-sentinel lymph node metastases in early oral cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2017Article
- Article
- Current status of oral cancer treatment strategies: surgical treatments for oral squamous cell carcinoma.International journal of clinical oncology · 2014Review
- A retrospective analysis of 5-year post surgery recurrence of N0 neck and the role of methylene blue in sentinel lymph node biopsy.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of the study was to evaluate the validity of sentinel node (SN) biopsy in early oral cancer patients focusing on the accuracy of intraoperative diagnoses of SN status, recurrences in follow-up and impact on patient survival. Previously untreated N0 oral cancer patients were candidates for the study. Using a radioisotope method, an intraoperative SN biopsy was performed. Patients with a positive frozen section of SN underwent immediate neck dissection as a single-stage procedure; they were followed in our outpatient clinic. Forty-five cT1-2N0 patients with squamous cell carcinoma were analyzed. There were seven patients with positive SN, five of whom were detected by intraoperative frozen section analysis. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the intraoperative frozen section analysis of SN were 71.4, 100 and 95.6%, respectively. There were 13 recurrences in the course of all patients treated. Those with positive SN showed a tendency toward recurrence. Three patients with negative SN suffered from delayed ipsilateral neck recurrence. These were considered false negatives at a rate of 7.9%. The 5-year overall survival rate of all patients was 91.1%. SN-positive patient survival was significantly poorer than that of SN-negative patients. Positive SN had a negative impact on the survival. SN biopsy was shown to be a valuable method for determining the neck status of early oral cancer patients. The concordance rate of intraoperative multislice frozen section analysis of SN and patient neck status at the time of operation was 95.6%. SN-positive patients exhibited a tendency toward cancer recurrence. There were three cases of false negatives not conforming to the SN concept and their rate was 7.9%. Positive SN had a negative impact on patient survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20725756What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.