Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20725744›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2011

Laparoscopic lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery with preservation of the left colic artery.

Mitsugu Sekimoto, Ichiro Takemasa, Tsunekazu Mizushima, Masataka Ikeda, Hirofumi Yamamoto, Yuichiro Doki, Masaki Mori

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03776370 (A Clinical Cohort Study on the Effect of Preserving Left Colonic Artery During Radical Resection of Rectal Cancer on Anastomotic Leakage and Oncology Efficacy), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03776370 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A Clinical Cohort Study on the Effect of Preserving Left Colonic Artery During Radical Resection of Rectal Cancer on Anastomotic Leakage and Oncology Efficacy

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorThird Military Medical UniversityRan2018 to 2022Enrolled200ConditionsPostoperative Complications, ProteinosisArmsPreserve the left colonic artery, The left colonic artery is not preserved
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Low Ligation Plus High DissectionFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Mesentery in Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mitsugu SekimotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. msekimoto@gesurg.med.osaka-u.ac.jp
Ichiro Takemasa
Tsunekazu Mizushima
Masataka Ikeda
Hirofumi Yamamoto
Yuichiro Doki
Masaki Mori
Osaka University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimCurative resection of sigmoid and rectal cancer includes "high tie" of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). However, IMA ligation compromises blood flow to the anastomosis, which may increase the leakage rate. Accordingly, some surgeons employ a technique of lymph node (LN) dissection around the IMA, preserving the IMA and left colic artery (LCA). The same technique was reported to need longer time in laparoscopic surgery due to technical difficulties. We present herein a simple and secure method of laparoscopic LN dissection around the IMA that allows preservation of the IMA and LCA, and report the operative results.

methodsOur method involves peeling off the vascular sheath from the IMA and dissection of the LN around the IMA together with the sheath. The feasibility of the technique was evaluated in 72 consecutive cases of laparoscopic resection of sigmoid and rectal cancer.

resultsThe IMA was ligated at its root in 27 cases (high tie, group A). Lymph nodes around the IMA were dissected with preservation of the IMA and LCA in 21 cases (group B). The root of the superior rectal artery was ligated in 24 cases of Tis and T1N0 ("low tie," group C). Mean operative time was 207.6, 221.2, and 198.5 min for group A, B, and C, respectively. Respective blood loss was 47.8, 44.0, and 58.5 g, and mean numbers of harvested LN were 17.3, 16.3, and 10.7. None of the operative results of groups A and B were different statistically. LN dissection was not associated with any morbidity.

conclusionOur method allows equivalent laparoscopic lymph node dissection to the high tie technique without excessive operative time or bleeding.

Indexed as

AgedAnastomotic LeakArteriesBlood Loss, SurgicalColonFemaleHumansLaparoscopyLength of StayLigationLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionMaleMesenteric Artery, InferiorMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID20725744
OpenAlexW1998579497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.