Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20725601›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroenergetics2010

The biological effect of contralateral forepaw stimulation in rat focal cerebral ischemia: a multispectral optical imaging study.

Janos Luckl, Wesley Baker, Zheng-Hui Sun, Turgut Durduran, Arjun G Yodh, Joel H Greenberg

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroenergetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Sensory stimulation in acute stroke therapy.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2018
    Review
  6. Simultaneous functional photoacoustic microscopy and electrocorticography reveal the impact of rtPA on dynamic neurovascular functions after cerebral ischemia.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2018
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neurovascular imaging.Frontiers in neuroenergetics · 2012
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Janos LucklDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Wesley Baker
Zheng-Hui Sun
Turgut Durduran
Arjun G Yodh
Joel H Greenberg
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Functional activation during cerebral ischemiaR01NS057400 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GREENBERG, JOEL H · 2008 to 2010
$1.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS057400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our group has already published the possible neuroprotective effect of contralateral forepaw stimulation in temporary focal ischemia in a study. However, the background is still unclear. In the present study we investigated the possible mechanism by monitoring focal ischemia with multispectral [laser speckle, imaging of intrinsic signals (OIS)] imaging. Sprague-Dawley rats were prepared using 1.2% isoflurane anesthesia. The middle cerebral artery was occluded by photothrombosis (4 mW) and the common carotid artery was ligated permanently. Physiological variables were constantly monitored during the experiment. A 6 x 6 mm area centered 3 mm posterior and 4 mm lateral to Bregma was thinned for laser speckle and OIS imaging. Nine circular regions of interests (0.3 mm in diameter) were evenly spaced on the speckle contrast image for the analysis of peri-infarct flow transients, blood flow, and metabolic changes. Both the sham (n = 7) and forepaw-stimulated animals (n = 7) underwent neurological examinations 24 h after ischemia at which point all animals were sacrificed and the infarct size was determined by triphenyltetrazolium chloride. The physiological variables were in normal range and the experimental protocol did not cause significant differences between groups. Both the neurological scores (sham: 3.6 +/- 1.7, stimulated: 4.3 +/- 1.4) and the infarct volume (sham: 124 +/- 39 mm(3), stimulated: 147 +/- 47 mm(3)) did not show significant differences between groups. The forepaw stimulation did not increase the intra-ischemic flow neither over the penumbral or the peri-ischemic area. However, the hemoglobin transients related metabolic load (CMRO(2)) was significantly lower (p < 0.001) while the averaged number of hyperemic flow transients were significantly (p = 0.013) higher in the forepaw (sham: 3.5 +/- 2.2, stimulated: 7.0 +/- 2.3) stimulated animals.

Indexed as

flow transientsfocal cerebral ischemiaforepaw stimulationmiddle cerebral artery occlusionOISoptical imagingphotothrombosisspeckle contrast

Identifiers

PMID20725601
PMCPMC2922941
OpenAlexW2104030344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.