Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20724590›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of pathology2010

Evaluation of bone marrow- and brain-derived neural stem cells in therapy of central nervous system autoimmunity.

Jingxian Yang, Yaping Yan, Bogoljub Ciric, Shuo Yu, Yangtai Guan, Hui Xu, Abdolmohamad Rostami, Guang-Xian Zhang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of pathology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin DExperimental and molecular pathology · 2017
    Article
  13. Effect of Fingolimod on Neural Stem Cells: A Novel Mechanism and Broadened Application for Neural Repair.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Selective depletion of CD11cEuropean journal of immunology · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Induced Stem Cells as a Novel Multiple Sclerosis Therapy.Current stem cell research & therapy · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Jingxian YangDepartment of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, USA.
Yaping Yan
Bogoljub Ciric
Shuo Yu
Yangtai Guan
Hui Xu
Abdolmohamad Rostami
Guang-Xian Zhang
Thomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adult subventricular zone (SVZ)-derived neural stem cells (NSCs) have therapeutic effects in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, an animal model of multiple sclerosis. However, SVZ precursor cells as a source of NSCs are not readily accessible for clinical application. In the present study, we demonstrate that NSCs derived from bone marrow (BM) cells exhibit comparable morphological properties as those derived from SVZ cells and possess a similar ability to differentiate into neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes both in vitro and in vivo. Importantly, both types of NSCs suppressed chronic experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis to a comparable extent on transplantation. Mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of NSCs include immunomodulation in the periphery and the central nervous system (CNS), neuron/oligodendrocyte repopulation by transplanted cells, and enhanced endogenous remyelination and axonal recovery. Furthermore, we provide evidence for the trans-differentiation of transplanted BM-NSCs into neural cells in the CNS, while no fusion of these cells with host neural cells was detected. This is the first study that directly compares SVZ- versus BM-NSCs with regard to in vivo neural differentiation and anti-inflammatory and therapeutic effects on CNS inflammatory demyelination. Their virtually identical therapeutic potential, greater accessibility, and autologous properties make BM-NSCs a novel and highly applicable substitute for SVZ-NSCs in cell-based multiple sclerosis therapies.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsApoptosisAstrocytesBone MarrowBrainCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCells, CulturedEncephalomyelitis, Autoimmune, ExperimentalEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleFlow CytometryHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesMice

Identifiers

PMID20724590
PMCPMC2947293
OpenAlexW2037699200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.