ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2010
Long-term physical and neurologic development in newborn infants with isolated single umbilical artery.
Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Risk Factors and Neonatal outcomes of Isolated Single Umbilical Artery in Singleton Pregnancy: A Meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2017Pooled it
- Association Between Isolated Single Umbilical Artery and Perinatal Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2016Pooled it
- Prenatal Evaluation of Genetic Abnormalities in Fetuses With Single Umbilical Artery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Genetics research · 2026Article
- Diagnosis of single umbilical artery and risk of foetal congenital malformations by prenatal ultrasound: a retrospective study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Association of placental and umbilical cord characteristics with cerebral palsy: national cohort study.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2023Article
- Prevalence of single umbilical artery, clinical outcomes and its risk factors: A cross-sectional study.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2021Article
- Association of isolated single umbilical artery with perinatal outcomes: Systemic review and meta-analysis.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2017Article
- Socioeconomic disadvantage and neural development from infancy through early childhood.International journal of epidemiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study compared birth parameters and the longitudinal course in physical and neurologic development between children with 2 and 3 vessel umbilical cords. STUDY
designOur study of the Collaborative Perinatal Project included singletons of at least 24 weeks' gestation with single umbilical artery at birth and no identifiable congenital anomalies. Demographics that were collected included maternal age, race, smoking status, and socioeconomic index. Delivery data included gestational age, birthweight, Apgar scores, placental weight, and umbilical cord insertion and length. Growth and neurodevelopmental parameters were collected at various intervals from birth to 7 years.
resultsThere were 263 infants with isolated single umbilical artery and 41,415 infants with 3 vessel cords. A random effect model that controlled for potential confounders did not show clinically significant differences in the physical and neurodevelopment measures between these groups.
conclusionOur study shows no evidence of differential longitudinal physical growth or neurologic outcomes between infants with 2 or 3 vessel cords.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.