Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20721976›Full record

ReviewMolecular carcinogenesis2010

The skinny on Slug.

Stephanie H Shirley, Laurie G Hudson, Jing He, Donna F Kusewitt

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular carcinogenesis, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Evolutionary Origins of Metabolic Reprogramming in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in cutaneous wound healing: Where we are and where we are heading.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie H ShirleyDepartment of Carcinogenesis, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Science Park Research Division, Smithville, Texas 78957, USA.
Laurie G Hudson
Jing He
Donna F Kusewitt
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
Pilot Project ProgramP30ES007784 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI RICHIE, ELLEN R · 1996 to 2011
$16.4M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN CARCINOGENESIS &MUTAGENESIST32CA009480 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI RICHIE, ELLEN R · 1985 to 2012
$3.0M
The role of Slug in cutaneous reepithelializationR01GM079381 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI HUDSON, LAURIE G · 2007 to 2010
$1.1M
Modulators of EMT in Skin CarcinogenesisR01CA089216 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KUSEWITT, DONNA F · 2003 to 2006
$956k
Slug Mediates the Acute Cutaneous Response to UVRR21AR054361 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KUSEWITT, DONNA FRANCES · 2008 to 2009
$373k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA16672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA089216NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009480NCI NIH HHS T32 CA09480NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR054361NIAMS NIH HHS R21AR054361NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES007784NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079381
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The zinc finger transcription factor Slug (Snai2) serves a wide variety of functions in the epidermis, with roles in skin development, hair growth, wound healing, skin cancer, and sunburn. Slug is expressed in basal keratinocytes and hair follicles where it is important in maintaining epidermal homeostasis. Slug also helps coordinate the skin response to exogenous stimuli. Slug is rapidly induced by a variety of growth factors and injurious agents and Slug controls, directly or indirectly, a variety of keratinocyte responses, including changes in differentiation, adhesion, motility, and production of inflammatory mediators. Slug thus modulates the interactions of the keratinocyte with its environment and with surrounding cells. The function of Slug in the epidermis appears to be distinct from that of the closely related Snail transcription factor.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell MovementEpidermisKeratinocytesMiceSnail Family Transcription FactorsTranscription FactorsWound HealingSnai2 protein, mouseSnail Family Transcription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID20721976
PMCPMC3632330
OpenAlexW2128592557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.