Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20721526›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2010

[Current aspects of anesthetic management in urological patients].

O Groll, J Peters

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

O GrollKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Deutschland. Oliver.Groll@UK-Essen.de
J Peters
University of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with coronary stents should take clopidogrel and acetylsalicylic acid for 4 weeks or 12 months after stenting. Stopping this medication early, e.g., for surgery, results in a 90-fold increase in the patient's risk for myocardial infarction from stent thrombosis. The mortality due to perioperative acute coronary syndrome clearly exceeds that due to perioperative bleeding complications. If oral medication resulting in platelet inhibition has to be paused "bridging" with short-acting, intravenous GPIIb/IIIa antagonists is possible. In recent years perioperative beta-blockade has been recommended for patients with high coronary vascular risk, and recently also for those with medium or low risk. Current studies, however, indicate that patients on beta-blockers have increased perioperative mortality because of bradycardia, hypotension, and anemia. Therefore, anemia and hypotension should be rigorously avoided.Anesthetic management may have an influence on the postoperative course of cancer. Combined epidural-general anesthesia provides a benefit by minimizing the use of systemic opioids and volatile anesthetics. Presumably, this and a decreased response to surgical stress increase the ability of the patient's immune system to deal with cancer dissemination and micrometastasis.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralGermanyHumansUrologic Surgical Procedures

Identifiers

PMID20721526
OpenAlexW1597614659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.