Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20719871›Full record

Trial reportJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2011

Psycholinguistic profiling differentiates specific language impairment from typical development and from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Sean M Redmond, Heather L Thompson, Sam Goldstein

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Adversity Exposure, Syntax, and Specific Language Impairment: An Exploratory Study.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Probing Phonological Processing Differences in Nonword Repetition for Children with Separate or Co-occurring Dyslexia and Developmental Language Disorder.Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sean M RedmondDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Utah, 390 South 1530 East BEHS, Room 1201, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0252, USA. sean.redmond@health.utah.edu
Heather L Thompson
Sam Goldstein

Funding

Psycholinguistic and Socioemotional Profiling of SLI and ADHDR03DC008382 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI REDMOND, SEAN M · 2006 to 2008
$220k
NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC008382ODCDC CDC HHS 5R03CD838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePractitioners must have confidence in the capacity of their language measures to discriminate developmental language disorders from typical development and from other common disorders. In this study, psycholinguistic profiles were collected from 3 groups: children with specific language impairment (SLI), children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and children with typical development (TD). The capacity of different language indices to successfully discriminate SLI cases from TD and ADHD cases was examined through response operating characteristics curves, likelihood ratios, and binary logistic regression.

methodThe Test of Early Grammatical Impairment (Rice & Wexler, 2001a), Dollaghan and Campbell's (1998) nonword repetition task, Redmond's (2005) sentence recall task, and the Test of Narrative Language (Gillam & Pearson, 2004) were administered to 60 children (7-8 years of age).

resultsDiagnostic accuracy was high for all 4 psycholinguistic measures, although modest reductions were observed with the SLI versus ADHD discriminations. Classification accuracy associated with using the Test of Early Grammatical Impairment and the Sentence Recall task was equivalent to using all 4 measures. IMPLICATIONS: Outcomes confirmed and extended previous investigations, documenting high levels of diagnostic integrity for these particular indices and supporting their incorporation into eligibility decisions, differential diagnosis, and the identification of comorbidity.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityChildDiagnosis, DifferentialEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHumansLanguage Development DisordersLanguage TestsLogistic ModelsMaleMemoryPsycholinguisticsReproducibility of ResultsROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID20719871
PMCPMC4493886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.