ArticleBMC public health2010
Including the public in pandemic planning: a deliberative approach.
Article in BMC public health, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Social distancing measures: barriers to their implementation and how they can be overcome - a systematic review.European journal of public health · 2021Pooled it
- Older people's perspectives on frailty screening in primary care settings - a citizens' jury study.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Public values to guide childhood vaccination mandates: A report on four Australian community juries.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- A Longitudinal Investigation of the Impact of COVID-19 on Patients With Chronic Pain.The journal of pain · 2023Article
- Voices of society: the emergence of civil-society practices aiming to engage in the management of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- Social innovation in health and community-driven engagement as a key strategy for addressing COVID-19 crisis challenges: insights and reflections from the multicultural society of Iran.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- Public health risk communication through the lens of a quarantined community: Insights from a coronavirus hotspot in Germany.PloS one · 2023Article
- Article
- Place of distancing measures in containing epidemics: a scoping review.The Libyan journal of medicine · 2022Article
- Exploring the impact of shielding advice on the wellbeing of individuals identified as clinically extremely vulnerable amid the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods evaluation.BMC public health · 2022Article
- "Thought provoking", "interactive", and "more like a peer talk": Testing the deliberative interview style in Germany.SSM. Qualitative research in health · 2021Article
- Patient and public engagement in decision-making regarding infectious disease outbreak management: an integrative review.BMJ global health · 2021Review
- How Much Money Should be Paid for a Patient to Isolate During the COVID-19 Outbreak? A Discrete Choice Experiment in Iran.Applied health economics and health policy · 2021Article
- Who should be vaccinated against COVID-19 first?Medicina clinica (English ed.) · 2021Article
- [Who should be vaccinated against COVID-19 first?]Medicina clinica · 2021Article
- Priority allocation of pandemic influenza vaccines in Australia - Recommendations of 3 community juries.Vaccine · 2021Article
- The indirect impact of COVID-19 on child health.Paediatrics and child health · 2020Review
- COVID-19 in the public housing towers of Melbourne: upholding social justice when invoking precaution.Australian and New Zealand journal of public health · 2020Article
- COVID-19: implementing sustainable low cost physical distancing and enhanced hygiene.The Medical journal of Australia · 2020Article
- A Preliminary Evaluation of the Public Risk Perception Related to the COVID-19 Health Emergency in Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAgainst a background of pandemic threat posed by SARS and avian H5N1 influenza, this study used deliberative forums to elucidate informed community perspectives on aspects of pandemic planning.
methodsTwo deliberative forums were carried out with members of the South Australian community. The forums were supported by a qualitative study with adults and youths, systematic reviews of the literature and the involvement of an extended group of academic experts and policy makers. The forum discussions were recorded with simultaneous transcription and analysed thematically.
resultsParticipants allocated scarce resources of antiviral drugs and pandemic vaccine based on a desire to preserve society function in a time of crisis. Participants were divided on the acceptability of social distancing and quarantine measures. However, should such measures be adopted, they thought that reasonable financial, household and psychological support was essential. In addition, provided such support was present, the participants, in general, were willing to impose strict sanctions on those who violated quarantine and social distancing measures.
conclusionsThe recommendations from the forums suggest that the implementation of pandemic plans in a severe pandemic will be challenging, but not impossible. Implementation may be more successful if the public is engaged in pandemic planning before a pandemic, effective communication of key points is practiced before and during a pandemic and if judicious use is made of supportive measures to assist those in quarantine or affected by social isolation measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.