ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2010
Recovery after caesarean birth: a qualitative study of women's accounts in Victoria, Australia.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Women's perceptions of urinary incontinence during the postpartum period: systematic review of qualitative evidence.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Pooled it
- Prevalence and correlates of postpartum PTSD following emergency cesarean sections: implications for perinatal mental health care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC psychology · 2025Pooled it
- Meta-analysis comparing different ultrasound detection methods to accurately assess wound healing and scar formation after caesarean section.International wound journal · 2024Pooled it
- Maternal and Neonatal Outcome following Day Two versus Day Five or Seven Discharge after an Uncomplicated Elective Caesarean Section: A Randomized Control Study.BioMed research international · 2021Trial
- Functional status of women with and without potentially life-threatening maternal conditions after 6 months postpartum: A cohort study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- "It's your body… so it's just nice to know what they're putting in it" A qualitative study of women's views and experiences of caesarean section, antibiotic use and infection.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- What matters to mothers: A qualitative exploration of pain and recovery after cesarean section.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Article
- Care Bundles: Enhanced Recovery After Delivery.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2023Article
- Timely initiation of breastfeeding and its factors among women delivered via cesarean section under spinal anesthesia at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, north-west Ethiopia, 2021: a hospital-based cross-sectional study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
- Long-term effects of caesarean delivery on health and behavioural outcomes of the mother and child in Bangladesh.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2022Article
- The Involvement of Past Traumatic Life Events in the Development of Postpartum PTSD after Cesarean Delivery.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Bleeding in women with venous thromboembolism during pregnancy: A systematic review of the literature.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022Article
- The association between intrapartum interventions and immediate and ongoing breastfeeding outcomes: an Australian retrospective population-based cohort study.International breastfeeding journal · 2022Article
- Psychometric properties of the Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) in Greek women after cesarean section.PloS one · 2021Article
- Decomposing the rural-urban gap in factors associated with childhood immunisation in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from surveys in 23 countries.BMJ global health · 2021Article
- Risk Perception of Health Professionals in Intrapartum Care Decisions: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.JMIR research protocols · 2020Article
- Living with a non-healing caesarean section wound: A mini-review.International wound journal · 2020Review
- Cost-benefit analysis of surveillance for surgical site infection following caesarean section.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Complementary alternative medicine use among postpartum mothers in a primary care setting: a cross-sectional study in Malaysia.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe caesarean section rate is increasing globally, especially in high income countries. The reasons for this continue to create wide debate. There is good epidemiological evidence on the maternal morbidity associated with caesarean section. Few studies have used women's personal accounts of their experiences of recovery after caesarean. The aim of this paper is to describe women's accounts of recovery after caesarean birth, from shortly after hospital discharge to between five months and seven years after surgery.
methodWomen who had at least one caesarean birth in a tertiary hospital in Victoria, Australia, participated in an interview study. Women were selected to ensure diversity in experiences (type of caesarean, recency), caesarean and vaginal birth, and maternal request caesarean section. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. A theoretical framework was developed (three Zones of clinical practice) and thematic analysis informed the findings.
resultsThirty-two women were interviewed who between them had 68 births; seven women had experienced both caesarean and vaginal births. Three zones of clinical practice were identified in women's descriptions of the reasons for their first caesareans. Twelve women described how, at the time of their first caesarean section, the operation was performed for potentially life-saving reasons (Central Zone), 11 described situations of clinical uncertainty (Grey Zone), and nine stated they actively sought surgical intervention (Peripheral Zone).Thirty of the 32 women described difficulties following the postoperative advice they received prior to hospital discharge and their physical recovery after caesarean was hindered by a range of health issues, including pain and reduced mobility, abdominal wound problems, infection, vaginal bleeding and urinary incontinence. These problems were experienced across the three zones of clinical practice, regardless of the reasons women gave for their caesarean.
conclusionThe women in this study reported a range of unanticipated and unwanted negative physical health outcomes following caesarean birth. This qualitative study adds to the existing epidemiological evidence of significant maternal morbidity after caesarean section and underlines the need for caesarean section to be reserved for circumstances where the benefit is known to outweigh the harms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.