Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20718454›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2010

Undulations enhance the effect of helical structure on DNA interactions.

D J Lee, A Wynveen, A A Kornyshev, S Leikin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nucleosome-induced homology recognition in chromatin.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D J LeeDepartment of Chemistry, Imperial College London, UK. domolee@hotmail.com
A Wynveen
A A Kornyshev
S Leikin
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

Recognition and self-assembly of DNA aggregatesZIAHD000257 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI LEIKIN, SERGEY · 2009 to 2014
$321k
Recognition and self-assembly of DNA aggregatesZ01HD000257 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI LEIKIN, SERGEY · 2007 to 2008
$224k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 HD000257Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HD000257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the past decade, theory and experiments have provided clear evidence that specific helical patterns of charged groups and adsorbed (condensed) counterions on the DNA surface are responsible for many important features of DNA-DNA interactions in hydrated aggregates. The effects of helical structure on DNA-DNA interactions result from a preferential juxtaposition of the negatively charged sugar phosphate backbone with counterions bound within the grooves of the opposing molecule. Analysis of X-ray diffraction experiments confirmed the mutual alignment of parallel molecules in hydrated aggregates required for such juxtaposition. However, it remained unclear how this alignment and molecular interactions might be affected by intrinsic and thermal fluctuations, which cause structural deviations away from an ideal double helical conformation. We previously argued that the torsional flexibility of DNA allows the molecules to adapt their structure to accommodate a more electrostatically favorable alignment between molecules, partially compensating disruptive fluctuation effects. In the present work, we develop a more comprehensive theory, incorporating also stretching and bending fluctuations of DNA. We found the effects of stretching to be qualitatively and quantitatively similar to those of twisting fluctuations. However, this theory predicts more dramatic and surprising effects of bending. Undulations of DNA in hydrated aggregates strongly amplify rather than weaken the helical structure effects. They enhance the structural adaptation, leading to better alignment of neighboring molecules and pushing the geometry of the DNA backbone closer to that of an ideal helix. These predictions are supported by a quantitative comparison of the calculated and measured osmotic pressures in DNA.

Indexed as

DNANucleic Acid ConformationOsmotic PressureStatic ElectricityThermodynamicsX-Ray DiffractionDNA

Identifiers

PMID20718454
PMCPMC2937169
OpenAlexW2079750593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.