ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2010
Undulations enhance the effect of helical structure on DNA interactions.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Geometry of braided DNA dictates supercoiling partitioning.Nature communications · 2026Article
- The Effects of Flexibility on dsDNA-dsDNA Interactions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Nucleosome-induced homology recognition in chromatin.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021Article
- Continuity of states between the cholesteric → line hexatic transition and the condensation transition in DNA solutions.Scientific reports · 2014Article
- Structure-driven homology pairing of chromatin fibers: the role of electrostatics and protein-induced bridging.Journal of biological physics · 2013Article
- Helical structure determines different susceptibilities of dsDNA, dsRNA, and tsDNA to counterion-induced condensation.Biophysical journal · 2013Article
- Signatures of DNA flexibility, interactions and sequence-related structural variations in classical X-ray diffraction patterns.Nucleic acids research · 2011Article
- Electrostatic braiding and homologous pairing of DNA double helices.Biophysical journal · 2011Article
- Electric Field of DNA in Solution: Who Is in Charge?Physical review. XArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
During the past decade, theory and experiments have provided clear evidence that specific helical patterns of charged groups and adsorbed (condensed) counterions on the DNA surface are responsible for many important features of DNA-DNA interactions in hydrated aggregates. The effects of helical structure on DNA-DNA interactions result from a preferential juxtaposition of the negatively charged sugar phosphate backbone with counterions bound within the grooves of the opposing molecule. Analysis of X-ray diffraction experiments confirmed the mutual alignment of parallel molecules in hydrated aggregates required for such juxtaposition. However, it remained unclear how this alignment and molecular interactions might be affected by intrinsic and thermal fluctuations, which cause structural deviations away from an ideal double helical conformation. We previously argued that the torsional flexibility of DNA allows the molecules to adapt their structure to accommodate a more electrostatically favorable alignment between molecules, partially compensating disruptive fluctuation effects. In the present work, we develop a more comprehensive theory, incorporating also stretching and bending fluctuations of DNA. We found the effects of stretching to be qualitatively and quantitatively similar to those of twisting fluctuations. However, this theory predicts more dramatic and surprising effects of bending. Undulations of DNA in hydrated aggregates strongly amplify rather than weaken the helical structure effects. They enhance the structural adaptation, leading to better alignment of neighboring molecules and pushing the geometry of the DNA backbone closer to that of an ideal helix. These predictions are supported by a quantitative comparison of the calculated and measured osmotic pressures in DNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.