Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20718086›Full record

ArticleCroatian medical journal2010

Human brucellosis in Macedonia - 10 years of clinical experience in endemic region.

Mile Bosilkovski, Ljiljana Krteva, Marija Dimzova, Ivan Vidinic, Zaklina Sopova, Katerina Spasovska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Croatian medical journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Case Report: Neurobrucellosis Presenting as Malignancy.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. SAGE open medical case reports · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mile BosilkovskiUniversity Clinic for Infectious Diseases and Febrile Conditions, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia. milebos@yahoo.com
Ljiljana Krteva
Marija Dimzova
Ivan Vidinic
Zaklina Sopova
Katerina Spasovska

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo present our 10-year clinical experience with brucellosis patients at the University Clinic for Infectious Diseases and Febrile Conditions in Skopje, Republic of Macedonia.

methodsA total of 550 patients with brucellosis treated between 1998 and 2007 were retrospectively assessed for their demographic, epidemiological, and clinical characteristics and outcomes.

resultsOf the 550 patients, 395 (72%) were male. The median age was 34.5 years (range, 1-82). Direct contact with infected animals was recorded in 333 (61%) patients and positive family history in 310 (56%). The most frequently seen symptoms were arthralgia (438, 80%), fever (419, 76%), and sweating (394, 72%). The most common signs were fever and hepatomegaly, which were verified in 357 (65%) and 273 (50%) patients, respectively. Focal brucellosis was found in 362 patients (66%) and osteoarticular in 299 (54%). Therapeutic failures were registered in 37 (6.7%) patients. Of the 453 (82%) patients who completed a follow-up period of at least 6 months, relapses occurred in 60 (13%).

conclusionDue to non-specific clinical manifestation and laboratory parameters, brucellosis should be considered one of the differential diagnoses of any patient suffering from obscure involvement of various organs in a brucellosis-endemic region. High percentage of relapses and therapeutic failures in spite of the use of currently recommended therapeutic regimens indicates the seriousness of this zoonosis and the need to control it.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsArthralgiaBrucellosisChildChild, PreschoolDisease OutbreaksEndemic DiseasesFemaleFeverHumansInfantAnti-Bacterial AgentsTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination

Identifiers

PMID20718086
PMCPMC2931438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.