Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20718083›Full record

ReviewCroatian medical journal2010

Review of detection of Brucella spp. by polymerase chain reaction.

Wei Ling Yu, Klaus Nielsen

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Croatian medical journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 158 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Two novel real-time PCR assays forMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Polyphasic Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Isolation and characterisation ofVeterinarni medicina · 2022
    Article
  18. Molecular Survey ofArchives of Razi Institute · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Molecular detection of Brucella spp. in ruminant herds in Greece.Tropical animal health and production · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wei Ling YuOttawa Laboratories (Fallowfield), Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 3851 Fallowfield Road, Nepean, Ontario, K2H 8P9, Canada.
Klaus Nielsen
Canadian Food Inspection Agency · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we present a review of most of the currently used polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods for identification of Brucella bacteria in biological samples. We focused in particular on methods using single-pair primers, multiplex primers, real-time PCRs, PCRs for marine Brucella, and PCRs for molecular biotyping. These methods are becoming very important tools for the identification of Brucella, at the species level and recently also at the biovar level. These techniques require minimum biological containment and can provide results in a very short time. In addition, genetic fingerprinting of isolates aid in epidemiological studies of the disease and its control. PCR-based methods are more useful and practical than conventional methods used to identify Brucella spp., and new methods for Brucella spp. identification and typing are still being developed. However, the sensitivity, specificity, and issues of quality control and quality assurance using these methods must be fully validated on clinical samples before PCR can be used in routine laboratory testing for brucellosis.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrucellaBrucellosisDNA, BacterialEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansMolecular TypingPolymerase Chain ReactionQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality ControlReagent Kits, DiagnosticSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, BacterialReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID20718083
PMCPMC2931435
OpenAlexW2069029552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.