ArticleGenetic epidemiology2010
On the genome-wide analysis of copy number variants in family-based designs: methods for combining family-based and population-based information for testing dichotomous or quantitative traits, or completely ascertained samples.
Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- On the association analysis of CNV data: a fast and robust family-based association method.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Dosage transmission disequilibrium test (dTDT) for linkage and association detection.PloS one · 2013Article
- The Growing Importance of CNVs: New Insights for Detection and Clinical Interpretation.Frontiers in genetics · 2013Article
- Family-based designs for genome-wide association studies.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We propose a new approach for the analysis of copy number variants (CNVs)for genome-wide association studies in family-based designs. Our new overall association test combines the between-family component and the within-family component of the family-based data so that the new test statistic is fully efficient and, at the same time, maintains robustness against population-admixture and stratification, like classical family-based association tests that are based only on the within-family component. Although all data are incorporated into the test statistic, an adjustment for genetic confounding is not needed, even for the between-family component. The new test statistic is valid for testing either quantitative or dichotomous phenotypes. If external CNV data are available, the approach can also be applied to completely ascertained samples. Similar to the approach by Ionita-Laza et al. ([2008]. Genet Epidemiol 32:273-284), the proposed test statistic does not require a CNV-calling algorithm and is based directly on the CNV probe intensities. We show, via simulation studies, that our methodology increases the power of the FBAT statistic to levels comparable to those of population-based designs. The advantages of the approach in practice are demonstrated by an application to a genome-wide association study for body mass index.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.