ArticleBritish journal of cancer2010
Education, survival and avoidable deaths in cancer patients in Finland.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Socioeconomic Status and Access to Treatment in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: criteria for first-line therapeutic choice-an opinion paper.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Disparities in Overall Survival Rates for Cancers across Income Levels in the Republic of Korea.Cancers · 2024Article
- Occupational Etiology of Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Statin Use, Cholesterol Level, and Mortality Among Females With Breast Cancer.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Socioeconomic disparities in cancer survival: Relation to stage at diagnosis, treatment, and centralization of patients to accredited hospitals, 2005-2014, Japan.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Role of Occupation in Shaping Cancer Disparities.Cancers · 2022Review
- Article
- Living alone as a risk factor for cancer incidence, case-fatality and all-cause mortality: A nationwide registry study.SSM - population health · 2021Article
- Early quality-of-life and psychological predictors of disease-free time and survival in localized prostate cancer.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019Article
- Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000-14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries.Lancet (London, England) · 2018Article
- Socioeconomic Differences and Lung Cancer Survival-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2018Article
- Marital status and survival of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a population-based study.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Cancer survival in New South Wales, Australia: socioeconomic disparities remain despite overall improvements.BMC cancer · 2016Article
- Educational differentials in cancer mortality and avoidable deaths in Lithuania, 2001-2009: a census-linked study.International journal of public health · 2015Article
- Article
- Estimating the potential survival gains by eliminating socioeconomic and sex inequalities in stage at diagnosis of melanoma.British journal of cancer · 2015Article
- Avoidable deaths and random variation in patients' survival.British journal of cancer · 2012Article
- Socioeconomic inequalities in mortality from conditions amenable to medical interventions: do they reflect inequalities in access or quality of health care?BMC public health · 2012Article
- Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995-2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data.Lancet (London, England) · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRelative survival after cancer in Finland is at the highest level observed in Europe and has, in general, been on a steady increase. The aim of this study is to assess whether the high survival is equally shared by different population subgroups and to estimate the possible gains that might be achieved if equity prevailed. MATERIALS AND
methodThe educational level and occupation before the cancer diagnosis of patients diagnosed in Finland in 1971-2005 was derived from an antecedent population census. The cancers were divided into 27 site categories. Cancer (cause)-specific 5-year survival proportions were calculated for three patient categories based on the educational level and for an occupational group of potentially health-conscious patients (physicians, nurses, teachers etc.). Proportions of avoidable deaths were derived by assuming that the patients from the two lower education categories would have the same mortality owing to cancer, as those from the highest educational category. Estimates were also made by additionally assuming that even the mortalities owing to other causes of death were all equal to those in the highest category.
resultsFor almost all the sites considered, survival was consistently highest for patients with the highest education and lowest for those with only basic education. The potentially health-conscious patients had an even higher survival. The differences were, in part, attributable to less favourable distributions of tumour stages in the lower education categories. In 1996-2005, 4-7% of the deaths in Finnish cancer patients could have potentially been avoided during the first 5-year period after diagnosis, if all the patients had the same cancer mortality as the patients with the highest educational background. The proportion would have also been much higher, 8-11%, if, in addition, the mortality from other causes had been the same as that in the highest educational category.
interpretationEven in a potentially equitable society with high health care standards, marked inequalities persist in cancer survival. Earlier cancer diagnosis and the ability to cope within the health care system may be a partly relevant explanation, but personal habits and lifestyles also have a role, particularly for the cancer patients' mortality from other causes of death than cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.