ReviewCurrent opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery2010
Cochlear efferent innervation and function.
Review in Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
79 citing papers in PubMed, 148 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differentiating Middle Ear and Medial Olivocochlear Effects on Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2017Trial
- Effect of Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Feedback on Perceptual Estimates of Cochlear Gain and Compression.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2016Trial
- Dopaminergic modulation of low- and high-spontaneous rate type I auditory nerve fiber activity.Journal of neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Notched noise reveals differential improvement in the neural representation of the sound envelope.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Acute Respiratory Tract Infection and Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Multinational Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Effects of stimuli and contralateral noise levels on auditory cortical potentials recorded in school-age children.PloS one · 2025Article
- Fast Inhibition Slows and Desynchronizes Mouse Auditory Efferent Neuron Activity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Genetic tools for studying cochlear inhibition.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024Review
- Abnormal outer hair cell efferent innervation in Hoxb1-dependent sensorineural hearing loss.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- Engineering olivocochlear inhibition to reduce acoustic trauma.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2023Article
- Molecular earplugs to protect the inner ear.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2023Article
- Effect of Efferent Stimulation on the Differential Sensitivity in Individuals with Normal Hearing.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022Article
- The effect of coffee on contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.F1000Research · 2022Article
- Article
- The role of the medial olivocochlear reflex in psychophysical masking and intensity resolution in humans: a review.Journal of neurophysiology · 2021Review
- Encoding sound in the cochlea: from receptor potential to afferent discharge.The Journal of physiology · 2021Review
- The Hair Cell α9α10 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor: Odd Cousin in an Old Family.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2021Review
- Effects of Multisession Anodal Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Cortex on Temporary Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in the Rat.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Nicotine evoked efferent transmitter release onto immature cochlear inner hair cells.Journal of neurophysiology · 2020Article
- Distribution of KExperimental neurobiology · 2020Article
19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review covers topics relevant to olivocochlear-efferent anatomy and function for which there are new findings in papers from 2009 to early 2010. RECENT
findingsWork within the review period has increased our understanding of medial olivocochlear (MOC) mechanisms in outer hair cells, MOC-reflex tuning, MOC effects on distortion product otoacoustic emissions, the time course of MOC effects, MOC effects in psychophysical tests and on understanding speech, MOC effects in attention and learning, and lateral efferent function in binaural hearing. In addition, there are new insights into efferent molecular mechanisms and their effect on cochlear development. SUMMARY: Techniques for measuring efferent effects using otoacoustic emissions are now well developed and have promise in clinical applications ranging from predicting which patients are susceptible to acoustic trauma to characterizing relationships between efferent activation and learning disabilities. To realize this promise, studies are needed in which these techniques are applied with high standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.