ArticleThe British journal of radiology2010
The future of imaging: developing the tools for monitoring response to therapy in oncology: the 2009 Sir James MacKenzie Davidson Memorial lecture.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- VOXEL-LEVEL MAPPING OF TRACER KINETICS IN PET STUDIES: A STATISTICAL APPROACH EMPHASIZING TISSUE LIFE TABLES.The annals of applied statistics · 2014Article
- Automated radiosynthesis of [(18)F]ML-10, a PET radiotracer dedicated to apoptosis imaging, on a TRACERLab FX-FN module.Molecular imaging and biology · 2013Article
- New frontiers in the design and synthesis of imaging probes for PET oncology: current challenges and future directions.Molecular imaging and biology · 2012Review
- Imaging in oncology--over a century of advances.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Since the days of Sir James MacKenzie Davidson, radiology discoveries have been shaping the way patients are managed. The lecture on which this review is based focused not on anatomical imaging, which already has a great impact on patient management, but on the molecular imaging of cancer targets and pathways. In this post-genomic era, we have several tools at our disposal to enable the discovery of new probes for stratifying patients for therapy and for monitoring response to therapy sooner than is possible using conventional cross-sectional imaging methods. I describe a chemical library approach to discovering new imaging agents, as well as novel methods for improving the metabolic stability of existing probes. Finally, I describe the evaluation of these probes for clinical use in both pre-clinical and clinical validation. The chemical library approach is exemplified by the discovery of isatin sulfonamide probes for imaging apoptosis in tumours. This approach allowed important desirable features of radiopharmaceuticals to be incorporated into the design strategy. A lead compound, [(18)F]ICMT11, is selectively taken up in vitro in cancer cells and in vivo in tumours undergoing apoptosis. Improvement of the metabolic stability of a probe is exemplified by work on [(18)F]fluoro-[1,2-(2)H(2)]choline ("[(18)F]-D4-choline"), a novel probe for imaging choline metabolism. Deuterium substitution significantly reduced the systemic metabolism of this compound relative to that of non-deuteriated analogues, supporting its future clinical use. In order for probes to be useful for monitoring response a number of validation and/or qualification studies need to be performed, including assessments of whether the probe measures the target or pathway of interest in a specific and reproducible manner, whether the probe is stable to metabolism in vivo, what is the best time to assess response with these probes and finally whether changes in radiotracer uptake are associated with clinical outcome. [(18)F]Fluorothymidine, a probe for proliferation imaging has been validated and qualified for use in breast cancer. In summary, the ability to create new molecules that can report on specific targets and pathways provides a strategy for studying response to treatment in cancer earlier than it is currently possible. This could fundamentally change the way medicine is practised in the next 5-10 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.