Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20716230›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2010

Effectiveness, safety and cost of drug substitution in hypertension.

Atholl Johnston, Panagiotis Stafylas, George S Stergiou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. An exploration of factors influencing the selection of generic and innovator medicines in Saudi Arabia using an observational cross-sectional study.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Improving Adherence to Treatment and Reducing Economic Costs of Hypertension: The Role of Olmesartan-Based Treatment.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2017
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The Effect of Dongeui Qigong for Prehypertension and Mild Essential Hypertension.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Editors' pick 2010.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2011
    Article
  17. Review
  18. From NCE to NICE: the role of pharmacoeconomics.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Atholl JohnstonClinical Pharmacology, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK. A.Johnston@qmul.ac.uk
Panagiotis Stafylas
George S Stergiou

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cost-containment measures in healthcare provision include the implementation of therapeutic and generic drug substitution strategies in patients whose condition is already well controlled with pharmacotherapy. Treatment for hypertension is frequently targeted for such measures. However, drug acquisition costs are only part of the cost-effectiveness equation, and a variety of other factors need to be taken into account when assessing the impact of switching antihypertensives. From the clinical perspective, considerations include maintenance of an appropriate medication dose during the switching process; drug equivalence in terms of clinical effectiveness; and safety issues, including the diverse adverse-event profiles of available alternative drugs, differences in the 'inactive' components of drug formulations and the quality of generic formulations. Patients' adherence to and persistence with therapy may be negatively influenced by switching, which will also impact on treatment effectiveness. From the economic perspective, the costs that are likely to be incurred by switching antihypertensives include those for additional clinic visits and laboratory tests, and for hospitalization if required to address problems arising from adverse events or poorly controlled hypertension. Indirect costs and the impact on patients' quality of life also require assessment. Substitution strategies for antihypertensives have not been tested in large outcome trials and there is little available clinical or economic evidence on which to base decisions to switch drugs. Although the cost of treatment should always be considered, careful assessment of the human and economic costs and benefits of antihypertensive drug substitution is required before this practice is recommended.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsClinical Trials as TopicCost-Benefit AnalysisDrugs, GenericHumansHypertensionPatient SatisfactionPractice Patterns, Physicians'Treatment OutcomeAntihypertensive AgentsDrugs, Generic

Identifiers

PMID20716230
PMCPMC2949902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.