Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20715309›Full record

ArticleHealth care management science2010

Length of stay and imminent discharge probability distributions from multistage models: variation by diagnosis, severity of illness, and hospital.

Gary W Harrison, Gabriel J Escobar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health care management science, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gary W HarrisonDepartment of Mathematics, College of Charleston, 66 George Street, Charleston, SC 29424, USA. harrisong@cofc.edu
Gabriel J Escobar

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multistage models have been effective at describing length of stay (LOS) distributions for diverse patient groups. Our study objective was to determine whether such models could be used for patient groups restricted by diagnosis, severity of illness, or hospital in order to facilitate comparisons conditioned on these factors. We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from 317,876 hospitalizations occurring over 2 years in 17 hospitals in a large, integrated health care delivery system. We estimated model parameters using data from the first year and validated them by comparing the predicted LOS distribution to the second year of data. We found that 3- and 4-stage models fit LOS data for either the entire hospital cohort or for subsets of patients with specific conditions (e.g. community-acquired pneumonia). Probability distributions were strongly influenced by the degree of physiologic derangement on admission, pre-existing comorbidities, or a summary mortality risk combining these with age, sex, and diagnosis. The distributions for groups with greater severity of illness were shifted slightly to the right, but even more notable was the increase in the dispersion, indicating the LOS is harder to predict with greater severity of illness. Multistage models facilitate computation of the hazard function, which shows the probability of imminent discharge given the elapsed LOS, and provide a unified method of fitting, summarizing, and studying the effects of factors affecting LOS distributions. Future work should not be restricted to expected LOS comparisons, but should incorporate examination of LOS probability distributions.

Indexed as

DiagnosisHospitalsLength of StayModels, TheoreticalPatient DischargeSeverity of Illness IndexCaliforniaCohort StudiesHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.