ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2010
Biomarkers in spondyloarthritis.
Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Decreased plasma levels of soluble CD18 link leukocyte infiltration with disease activity in spondyloarthritis.Arthritis research & therapy · 2014Article
- Association of biomarkers of inflammation, cartilage and bone turnover with gender, disease activity, radiological damage and sacroiliitis by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with early spondyloarthritis.Clinical rheumatology · 2014Article
- MRI and X-ray in axial spondyloarthritis: the relationship between inflammatory and structural changes.Arthritis research & therapy · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Key challenges in the management of spondyloarthritis focus on the lack of availability of measures of disease activity and the inability to predict joint damage or response to treatment, which is expensive and associated with potentially serious toxicity. Recent studies have focused on the possible contribution of soluble biomarkers, which have been selected based on current understanding of their role in inflammation and/or their association with turnover of joint matrix. Emerging candidates for disease activity markers include interleukin-6 and soluble cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated molecule-4. Potential predictors of damage include metalloproteinase-3 and sclerostin. Acute-phase reactants C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A and interleukin-6 are currently the best predictors of treatment response. Significant study limitations are small sample size and the lack of multivariate analyses that can determine whether the biomarker contributes information that is independent of other clinical and laboratory variables used in routine care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20714832What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.