ReviewCurrent HIV/AIDS reports2010
Readiness: the state of the science (or the lack thereof).
Review in Current HIV/AIDS reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02459678 (ART Readiness in HIV-infected Pregnant Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
ART Readiness in HIV-infected Pregnant Women: From Formative Qualitative Research to Individual Randomized Trial
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Trial
- Development and validation of a novel scale for antiretroviral therapy readiness among pregnant women in urban Zambia with newly diagnosed HIV infection.AIDS research and therapy · 2023Article
- Factors associated with readiness to start antiretroviral therapy (ART) among young people (15-24 years) at four HIV clinics in Mulago Hospital, Uganda.African health sciences · 2021Article
- A Qualitative Study of the Experience of Immediate Antiretroviral Therapy Among Urban Persons With Newly Diagnosed Human Immunodeficiency Virus.Open forum infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Why Counseling Intervention Fails to Improve Compliance towards Antiretroviral Therapy: Findings from a Mixed-Methods Study among People Living with HIV in Bali Province, Indonesia.Infectious disease reports · 2021Article
- Immediate Antiretroviral Therapy: The Need for a Health Equity Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Same-day antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation in pregnancy is not associated with viral suppression or engagement in care: A cohort study.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2018Article
- Readiness for Antiretroviral Therapy: Implications for Linking HIV-Infected Individuals to Care and Treatment.AIDS and behavior · 2018Article
- Reasons for not starting antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected individuals: a changing landscape.Infection · 2016Article
- Retained in HIV Care But Not on Antiretroviral Treatment: A Qualitative Patient-Provider Dyadic Study.PLoS medicine · 2015Article
- HIV-Infected Individuals Who Delay, Decline, or Discontinue Antiretroviral Therapy: Comparing Clinic- and Peer-Recruited Cohorts.Frontiers in public health · 2014Article
- Systemic delays in the initiation of antiretroviral therapy during pregnancy do not improve outcomes of HIV-positive mothers: a cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2012Article
- Development and validation of a measure for intention to adhere to HIV treatment.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2012Article
- Antiretroviral therapy in Indian setting: when & what to start with, when & what to switch to?The Indian journal of medical research · 2011Review
- Strategies to improve HIV treatment adherence in developed countries: clinical management at the individual level.HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2011Article
- Retention in care within 1 year of initial HIV care visit in a multisite US cohort: who's in and who's out?Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS CareObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
HIV treatment guidelines state that patients' readiness should be assessed before initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) to assure adherence. None of the guidelines provide a way to measure readiness. Therefore, this article sought to review the literature on readiness to determine if there was a viable predictor of adherence. Twenty-seven articles were reviewed. Nine described studies that examined the relationship between a measure of readiness and HAART adherence. No readiness measure demonstrated clinical utility as a predictor of adherence. Study flaws included small sample sizes (only one study >100 patients), short follow-up periods (all ≤1 year and six were ≤5 months, four ≤1 month), measures of readiness that related poorly to adherence, and inconsistent adherence measures (eight different measures were used by the researchers). Neither the guidelines nor the literature will help clinicians judge who should initiate HAART and who should delay treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.