ReviewPediatric radiology2011
Update on congenital nephrotic syndromes and the contribution of US.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Presentation, Genetic Testing, and Outcome of Congenital Nephrotic Syndrome in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.Nephron · 2026Article
- Suspicion of Frasier's Syndrome in the Nephrology Unit of the State University Hospital of Haiti: Case Study and Review of Literature.International medical case reports journal · 2021Article
- Gene mutation analysis in 12 Chinese children with congenital nephrotic syndrome.BMC nephrology · 2018Article
- Congenital nephrotic syndrome with dysmorphic features and death in early infancy: Answers.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2016Article
- Sonographic Diagnosis in a Rare Aetiology of Neonatal Scrotal Swellings: A Case Report of Congenital Nephrotic Syndrome.Polish journal of radiology · 2016Article
- A novel nonsense mutation in NPHS1: is aortic stenosis associated with congenital nephropathy?Journal of genetics · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical classification of nephrotic syndrome (NS) is based on age at presentation. However, this classification is arbitrary because the majority of early onset NS has a genetic origin and has a widespread age of onset (from fetal life to several years). The aims of this review are to illustrate the knowledge accumulated on congenital nephrotic syndrome (CNS) in terms of genetics, classification, findings at histology and US-based on a review of the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20714714What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.