Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20714419›Full record

ReviewMarine drugs2010

Chitin research revisited.

Feisal Khoushab, Montarop Yamabhai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Marine drugs, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sustainable Lipid Production withMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Investigation of 9 True Weevil (Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Rational Design of a Potential New Nematicide Targeting Chitin Deacetylase.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Assessment of black soldier fly (Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2023
    Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Feisal KhoushabSchool of Biotechnology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand. fl.khoushab@gmail.com
Montarop Yamabhai

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two centuries after the discovery of chitin, it is widely accepted that this biopolymer is an important biomaterial in many aspects. Numerous studies on chitin have focused on its biomedical applications. In this review, various aspects of chitin research including sources, structure, biosynthesis, chitinolytic enzyme, chitin binding protein, genetic engineering approach to produce chitin, chitin and evolution, and a wide range of applications in bio- and nanotechnology will be dealt with.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiotechnologyChitinGenetic EngineeringHumansNanotechnologyProtein BindingChitinapplicationbiotechnologychitinchito-oligosaccharidechitosannanobiotechnologynanotechnology

Identifiers

PMID20714419
PMCPMC2920538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.