Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20714369›Full record

ArticleBiomicrofluidics2010

Micro-optofluidic Lenses: A review.

Nam-Trung Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Anion Intercalation into Graphite Drives Surface Wetting.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Electrically Tunable Lenses: A Review.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021
    Review
  13. Biomimetic optics: liquid-based optical elements imitating the eye functionality.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020
    Review
  14. Triboelectric effect-modulated varifocal liquid lens.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2020
    Article
  15. Dynamic microscale flow patterning using electrical modulation of zeta potential.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nam-Trung NguyenSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore, 639798.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review presents a systematic perspective on the development of micro-optofluidic lenses. The progress on the development of micro-optofluidic lenses are illustrated by example from recent literature. The advantage of micro-optofluidic lenses over solid lens systems is their tunability without the use of large actuators such as servo motors. Depending on the relative orientation of light path and the substrate surface, micro-optofluidic lenses can be categorized as in-plane or out-of-plane lenses. However, this review will focus on the tunability of the lenses and categorizes them according to the concept of tunability. Micro-optofluidic lenses can be either tuned by the liquid in use or by the shape of the lens. Micro-optofluidic lenses with tunable shape are categorized according to the actuation schemes. Typical parameters of micro-optofluidic lenses reported recently are compared and discussed. Finally, perspectives are given for future works in this field.

Identifiers

PMID20714369
PMCPMC2921414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.