Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20714306›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2010

Molecular evolution of functional nucleic acids with chemical modifications.

Masayasu Kuwahara, Naoki Sugimoto

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Spiegelmer-Based Sandwich Assay for Cardiac Troponin I Detection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  19. Nucleic Acid Immunotherapeutics for Cancer.ACS applied bio materials · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Masayasu KuwaharaChemistry Laboratory of Artificial Biomolecules (CLAB), Graduate School of Engineering, Gunma University, Kiryu, Gunma, Japan. kuwahara@chem-bio.gunma-u.ac.jp
Naoki Sugimoto
Gunma University · JPKonan University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleic acids are attractive materials for creating functional molecules that have applications as catalysts, specific binders, and molecular switches. Nucleic acids having such functions can be obtained by random screening, typically using in vitro selection methods. These methods have helped explore the potential abilities of nucleic acids and steadily contributed to their evolution, i.e., creation of RNA/DNA enzymes, aptamers, and aptazymes. Chemical modification would be a key means to further increase their performance, e.g., expansion of function diversity, enhancement of activity, and improvement of biostability for biological use. Indeed, in the past two decades, random screening involving chemical modification, post-SELEX chemical modification, and rational design methods have been advanced, and combining and integrating these methods may produce a new class of functional nucleic acids. This review focuses on the effectiveness of chemical modifications on the evolution of nucleic acids as functional molecules and the outlook for related technologies.

Indexed as

Directed Molecular EvolutionAptamers, NucleotideBase SequenceEnzymesMolecular Sequence DataNucleic AcidsSELEX Aptamer TechniqueAptamers, NucleotideEnzymesNucleic Acids

Identifiers

PMID20714306
PMCPMC6257756
OpenAlexW2043735713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.