Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20714109›Full record

ArticlePublic health genomics2011

Public understanding of risks from gene-environment interaction in common diseases: implications for public communications.

C M Condit, L Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health genomics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Interactive Beliefs about Genes and Behavior Predict Improved Sun Protection Following Melanoma Genetic Counseling.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. Study of an Educational Telenovela to Teach Genomics among Latino Farmworkers and Nonfarmworkers: Lessons Learned.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Parents' Understanding of Genetics and Heritability.Journal of genetic counseling · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Priorities for autism spectrum disorder risk communication and ethics.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2013
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C M ConditDepartment of Speech Communication, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-1725, USA. ccondit@uga.edu
L Shen

Funding

Lay and Expert Models of Gene-Environment InteractionR01HG003961 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI CONDIT, CELESTE MICHELLE · 2006 to 2008
$980k
NHGRI NIH HHS HG003961-01NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsPublic understanding of the relationship between health behaviors and genes is likely to affect the motivational impact of learning information about one's own genes. Extant research has featured difficulty measuring public understandings of this relationship. This essay explores public understanding of the relationship between genes and behavior, especially with regard to the mathematical relationships to risk concept. It contributes a psychometrically valid scale for measuring beliefs about gene- behavior relationships.

methodsThree population representative surveys (n = 633, 658, 1,218) were conducted using the Knowledge Networks panel platform.

resultsInterpretations of risk vary depending on whether genes and behavior are conceived of as health-damaging (loss frame) or health-protecting (gain frame). In the loss frame, the majority of the population adopts an additive model of the relationship with approximately one-third adopting an amplificative model. In the gain frame, beliefs are divided roughly equally among additive, amplificative and sub-additive models. Scores on the nonmathematically based scale indicate higher belief in the existence of interaction than scores on the more concrete question format.

conclusionsThe existence of different interpretations of gene-behavior relationships based on gain/loss frame and abstract/concrete modes indicates the need to select frame and mode carefully in both teaching and research. Research is needed to identify optimal configurations for teaching and presenting this relatively complex material.

Indexed as

EnvironmentAdolescentAdultAgedAttitude to HealthCommunicationFemaleGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalPsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID20714109
PMCPMC3214934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.