Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20713792›Full record

ReviewAnnals of internal medicine2010

Narrative review: ventilator-induced respiratory muscle weakness.

Martin J Tobin, Franco Laghi, Amal Jubran

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of internal medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02838524 completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Acceptable Range of Inspiratory Effort During Mechanical Ventilation

TypeobservationalSponsorUnity Health TorontoRan2016 to 2018Enrolled43ConditionsElective Cardiac Surgery
NCT05144607 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Impact of the Display of Inspiratory Muscle Pressure Curves Estimated by Artificial Intelligence on the Ability of Health Care Professionals to Correctly Identify Patient-ventilator Asynchronies - Pmus Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Sirio-LibanesRan2021 to 2021Enrolled105ConditionsMechanical Ventilation ComplicationArmsMuscle Pressure curve (Pmus)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2019
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin J TobinEdward Hines Jr. Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, Illinois 60141, USA. mtobin2@lumc.edu
Franco Laghi
Amal Jubran
Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital · US

Funding

Weaning from Prolonged Mechanical VentilationR01NR008782 · NINR · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI JUBRAN, AMAL · 2004 to 2008
$1.4M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR008782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinicians have long been aware that substantial lung injury results when mechanical ventilation imposes too much stress on the pulmonary parenchyma. Evidence is accruing that substantial injury may also result when the ventilator imposes too little stress on the respiratory muscles. Through adjustment of ventilator settings and administration of pharmacotherapy, the respiratory muscles may be rendered almost (or completely) inactive. Research in animals has shown that diaphragmatic inactivity produces severe injury and atrophy of muscle fibers. Human data have recently revealed that 18 to 69 hours of complete diaphragmatic inactivity associated with mechanical ventilation decreased the cross-sectional areas of diaphragmatic fibers by half or more. The atrophic injury seems to result from increased oxidative stress leading to activation of protein-degradation pathways. Scientific understanding of ventilator-induced respiratory muscle injury has not reached the stage where meaningful controlled trials can be done, and thus, it is not possible to give concrete recommendations for patient management. In the meantime, clinicians are advised to select ventilator settings that avoid both excessive patient effort and excessive respiratory muscle rest. The contour of the airway pressure waveform on a ventilator screen provides the most practical indication of patient effort, and clinicians are advised to pay close attention to the waveform as they titrate ventilator settings. Research on ventilator-induced respiratory muscle injury is in its infancy and portends to be an exciting area to follow.

Indexed as

AnimalsAtrophyHumansModels, AnimalMuscle WeaknessOxidative StressRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Muscles

Identifiers

PMID20713792
PMCPMC2924757
OpenAlexW2032432900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.