Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20713478›Full record

Trial reportPediatrics2010

Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 in infantile colic: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Francesco Savino, Lisa Cordisco, Valentina Tarasco, Elisabetta Palumeri, Roberto Calabrese, Roberto Oggero, Stefan Roos, Diego Matteuzzi

5 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatrics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 122 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01249911 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy & Cost-Effectiveness of Lactobacillus Reuteri DSM 17938 Administration to Prevent the Risk of Respiratory or Gastrointestinal Infections in Child Day Care Centers: A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Control Trial (RDDCT).

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of Pediatrics, MexicoRan2011 to 2011Enrolled269ConditionsHealthy InfantsArmsLreuteri, Placebo
NCT01587846 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

Lactobacillus Reuteri in Treatment of Functional Abdominal Pain and Chronic Constipation in Children - Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSisters of Mercy University HospitalRan2012 to 2013Enrolled300ConditionsAbdominal Pain, Constipation - FunctionalArmsAdministration of L.reuteri in children with abdominal pain, Administration of placebo in children with abdominal pain, Administration of L.reuteri in children with constipation, Administration of placebo in children with constipation
NCT02577133 phase2 / phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Prevention of Colic With the Probiotic Lactobacillus Reuteri in Mexican Infants: Randomized, Double-blind Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital General Naval de Alta Especialidad - Escuela Medico NavalRan2015 to 2016Enrolled478ConditionsColicArmsLactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938, Placebo
NCT03219931 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Effects of an Association of the Two Bifidobacteria Probiotics Bifidobacterium Breve B632 and Bifidobacterium Breve BR03 in Intestinal Bacterial Colonization and in the Prevention and/or Reduction of the Incidence of Colics in Infants

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della CaritaRan2013 to 2017Enrolled320ConditionsColic, Infantile, Probiotic, Gut Microbiome, Bifidobacterium BreveArmsBifidobacterium breve BR03 and Bifidobacterium breve B632, Placebos
NCT05894798 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2050, after this paper: background citation

Acupuncture in Infantile Colic - A Randomised Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion SkaneRan2050 to 2060Enrolled0ConditionsInfant, Newborn, Diseases, Colic, Infantile, AcupunctureArmsAcupuncture
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Probiotics in infants for prevention of allergic disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Probiotics to prevent infantile colic.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Nutrients · 2020
    Trial

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Francesco SavinoDepartment of Pediatrics, Regina Margherita Children Hospital, University of Turin, Piazza Polonia, 94 10126 Turin, Italy. francesco.savino@unito.it
Lisa Cordisco
Valentina Tarasco
Elisabetta Palumeri
Roberto Calabrese
Roberto Oggero
Stefan Roos
Diego Matteuzzi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo test the efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri on infantile colic and to evaluate its relationship to the gut microbiota. STUDY

designFifty exclusively breastfed colicky infants, diagnosed according to modified Wessel's criteria, were randomly assigned to receive either L reuteri DSM 17 938 (10(8) colony-forming units) or placebo daily for 21 days. Parental questionnaires monitored daily crying time and adverse effects. Stool samples were collected for microbiologic analysis.

resultsForty-six infants (L reuteri group: 25; placebo group: 21) completed the trial. Daily crying times in minutes/day (median [interquartile range]) were 370 (120) vs 300 (150) (P=.127) on day 0 and 35.0 (85) vs 90.0 (148) (P=.022) on day 21, in the L reuteri and placebo groups, respectively. Responders (50% reduction in crying time from baseline) were significantly higher in the L reuteri group versus placebo group on days 7 (20 vs 8; P=.006), 14 (24 vs 13; P=.007), and 21 (24 vs 15; P=.036). During the study, there was a significant increase in fecal lactobacilli (P=.002) and a reduction in fecal Escherichia coli and ammonia in the L reuteri group only (P=.001). There were no differences in weight gain, stooling frequency, or incidence of constipation or regurgitation between groups, and no adverse events related to the supplementation were observed.

conclusionL. reuteri DSM 17 938 at a dose of 10(8) colony-forming units per day in early breastfed infants improved symptoms of infantile colic and was well tolerated and safe. Gut microbiota changes induced by the probiotic could be involved in the observed clinical improvement.

Indexed as

Limosilactobacillus reuteriColicDouble-Blind MethodFecesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID20713478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.