Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20713072›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2010

Motion-onset visual evoked potentials predict performance during a global direction discrimination task.

Tim Martin, Krystel R Huxlin, Voyko Kavcic

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05085210 (Visual Restoration of Losses Caused by Cortical Damage), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05085210 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Visual Restoration of Losses Caused by Cortical Damage: a New Protocol to Promote Fast Recovery

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterRan2022 to 2026Enrolled24ConditionsVisual Field Defect, Peripheral, Stroke, Visual Impairment, HemianopsiaArmstranscranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), Computer Based Visual Training, Sham stimulation, Virtual Reality Based Visual Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Global motion evoked potentials in autistic and dyslexic children: A cross-syndrome approach.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The relationship between baseline EEG spectra power and memory performance in older African Americans endorsing cognitive concerns in a community setting.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2016
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tim MartinDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA. tma2010@yahoo.com
Krystel R Huxlin
Voyko Kavcic

Funding

VISUAL SCIENCET32EY007125 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Krystel R Huxlin, Duje Tadin · 1990 to 2026
$7.1M
NEI NIH HHS L30 EY01773NEI NIH HHS L30 EY017773NEI NIH HHS P30EY0131NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007125NEI NIH HHS T32EY007125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between cognitive processing stages and event-related potential components has been extensively researched for single components, but even the simplest task comprises multiple electrophysiological and cognitive components. Here we examined the relationship between behavioral measures and several visual evoked potentials (VEPs) related to global motion onset during a visual motion discrimination task. In addition to reaction time and accuracy, the EZ diffusion model was used to characterize elements of the decision process. Results showed that latencies, but not amplitudes, from three VEP components reliably predicted about 40% of the variance in reaction times for motion discrimination. These included the latency from stimulus motion onset to N2 onset, the latency from N2 onset to N2 peak, and the latency from the N2 peak to the peak of a late positive potential. These latencies were also able to predict the rate of information accumulation during the decision process and the duration of non-decision processes, but not the observer's threshold (boundary) for making a response. This pattern of results is consistent with an interpretation of these three latencies as reflecting a non-specific visual perceptual process, a motion-specific process, and a decision process, respectively. The relationship between the earliest interval and drift rate estimated with the EZ model also supports the notion that early perceptual processing might be a constituent part of the decision process itself.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain MappingDiscrimination, PsychologicalElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalMotion PerceptionOrientationPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID20713072
PMCPMC2998714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.