ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2010
Empirical support for a multi-dimensional model of sensations experienced by youth during their initial smoking episodes.
Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Initial Subjective Response to Nicotine Vaping Predicts Subsequent E-Cigarette Use in Early Adolescence: An ABCD Investigation.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025Article
- Pathways to the persistence of drug use despite its adverse consequences.Molecular psychiatry · 2023Review
- Youth peer crowds and risk of cigarette use: The effects of dual peer crowd identification among hip hop youth.Addictive behaviors reports · 2019Article
- The Hip Hop peer crowd: An opportunity for intervention to reduce tobacco use among at-risk youth.Addictive behaviors · 2018Article
- Symptoms during Adolescents' First Use of Cigarettes and E-Cigarettes: A Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017Article
- Initial reactions to tobacco use and risk of future regular use.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo examine the dimensionality of sensations experienced during initial tobacco smoking.
designCross-sectional survey.
settingThirteen secondary schools located in British Columbia, Canada.
participantsData from 1187 adolescents who responded 'yes' to the question: 'Have you ever tried cigarette smoking, even one or two puffs?'. MEASUREMENTS: Participants answered questions about their demographic characteristics, tobacco smoking history and sensations experienced during their initial smoking episodes.
findingsThe sensations appear to represent the following three separate but modestly correlated dimensions: a pleasant dimension defined by feeling good and relaxed; an unpleasant dimension defined by coughing, feeling sick and nervous; and a 'buzz' dimension defined by feeling high and dizzy. The three factors made statistically significant contributions to the prediction of transition to regular smoking (defined as having smoked at least 100 cigarettes in one's life-time) after adjusting for age, sex and age at first puff.
conclusionsThe results suggest that three relatively distinct physiological systems appear to explain the relationship between initial smoking sensations and probability of becoming a regular smoker. Researchers examining sensations experienced during initial tobacco smoking episodes should consider using a three-dimensional profile of symptoms composed of pleasant, unpleasant and buzz dimensions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.