ArticleHealth information and libraries journal2010
Caption-based topical descriptors for microscopic images as published in academic papers.
Article in Health information and libraries journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVisual findings summarized in the figures and tables of academic papers are invaluable sources for biomedical researchers. Captions associated with the visual findings are often neglected while retrieving biomedical images in published academic papers.
objectivesThis study is to assess caption-based topical descriptors for microscopic images of breast neoplasms, as published in academic papers retrieved through the PubMed Central database.
methodHuman indexers as well as an automatic keyword finder called TAPoR generated the topical descriptors from collected captions. The study then compared the human-generated descriptors to machine-generated descriptors. Finally, a set of core descriptors was developed from both sets and automatically mapped into the Unified Medical Language System's (UMLS) Metathesaurus through a MetaMap Transfer engine.
resultsMajor topical descriptors included histologic disease names, laboratory procedures, genetic functions and components. Human indexers provided more relevant descriptors than TAPoR. The UMLS Metathesaurus identified several semantic types including Indicator, Reagent, or Diagnostic Aid; Organic Chemical; Laboratory Procedure; Spatial Concept; Qualitative Concept; and Quantitative Concept. DISCUSSION: The findings suggest that caption-based descriptors can complement title or abstract-based literature indexing for figure image retrieval in articles. With respect to forming a metadata framework for online microscopic image description, the semantic types can be used as a core metadata set. In this regard, this finding can be used for standardising a microscopic image description protocol to train medical students.
conclusionsIt is incumbent upon libraries and other information agencies to promote and maintain an interest in the opportunities and challenges associated with biomedical imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.