Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20711715›Full record

Trial reportDiabetologia2010

Sensor-augmented pump therapy from the diagnosis of childhood type 1 diabetes: results of the Paediatric Onset Study (ONSET) after 12 months of treatment.

O Kordonouri, E Pankowska, B Rami, T Kapellen, R Coutant, R Hartmann, K Lange, M Knip, T Danne

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetologia, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Continuous glucose monitoring systems for type 1 diabetes mellitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. C-peptide and residual β-cell function in pediatric diabetes - state of the art.Pediatric endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Neonatal Diabetes Mellitus.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2018
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

O KordonouriBult Diabetes Centre for Children and Adolescents, Kinderkrankenhaus auf der Bult, Janusz-Korczak-Allee 12, D-30173 Hannover, Germany.
E Pankowska
B Rami
T Kapellen
R Coutant
R Hartmann
K Lange
M Knip
T Danne
Kinderkrankenhaus auf der Bult · DECentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRKlinik und Poliklinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin · DEMedical University of Vienna · ATMedical University of Warsaw · PLMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisThe value of managing children with type 1 diabetes using a combination of insulin pump and continuous glucose monitoring starting from diagnosis for improving subsequent glycaemic control and preserving residual beta cell function was determined.

methodsA total of 160 children (aged 1-16 years, mean ± SD: 8.7 ± 4.4 years; 47.5% girls) were randomised to receive insulin pump treatment with continuous glucose monitoring or conventional self-monitoring blood glucose measurements. The primary outcome was the level of HbA(1c) after 12 months. Other analyses included fasting C-peptide, glycaemic variability, sensor usage, adverse events, children's health-related quality of life and parent's wellbeing.

resultsHbA(1c) was not significantly different between the two groups, but patients with regular sensor use had lower values (mean 7.1%, 95% CI 6.8-7.4%) compared with the combined group with no or low sensor usage (mean 7.6%, 95% CI 7.3-7.9%; p=0.032). At 12 months, glycaemic variability was lower in the sensor group (mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions 80.2 ± 26.2 vs 92.0 ± 33.7; p=0.037). Higher C-peptide concentrations were seen in sensor-treated 12- to 16-year-old patients (0.25 ± 0.12 nmol/l) compared with those treated with insulin pump alone (0.19 ± 0.07 nmol/l; p=0.033). Severe hypoglycaemia was reported only in the group without sensors (four episodes). CONCLUSION/

interpretationSensor-augmented pump therapy starting from the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes can be associated with less decline in fasting C-peptide particularly in older children, although regular sensor use is a prerequisite for improved glycaemic control.

trial registrationISRCTN.org ISRCTN05450731

fundingMedtronic International Trading Sàrl, Tolochenaz, Switzerland.

Indexed as

Insulin Infusion SystemsAdolescentAge of OnsetBiosensing TechniquesChildChild, PreschoolDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInfantInsulinMaleQuality of LifeTime FactorsHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin

Identifiers

PMID20711715
OpenAlexW1966350212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.