Trial reportExperimental brain research2010
Event-related potentials before saccades and antisaccades and their relation to reaction time.
Trial report in Experimental brain research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mapping neural dynamics underlying saccade preparation and execution and their relation to reaction time and direction errors.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
- The contribution of pre-stimulus neural oscillatory activity to spontaneous response time variability.NeuroImage · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the present study, reaction time (RT) was measured in 12 healthy subjects in a saccade and antisaccade task while recording electroencephalographic activity (EEG) from 62 electrodes on the scalp. Event-related potentials averaged both on target appearance and on saccade onset were larger in amplitude (increased negativity) for the antisaccade task compared to the saccade task. The relation of RT variability to EEG amplitude was studied by averaging stimulus-aligned and movement-aligned individual trials for each subject into four RT quartile groups. The analysis showed a relation of EEG amplitude to RT for both saccades and antisaccades. More specifically, the ERP negativity at 100-120 ms after stimulus onset in the saccade task and at 160-200 ms after stimulus onset in the antisaccade task for stimulus-aligned ERPs decreased monotonically with increasing RT as would be expected if this signal would be related to the eye movement preparation processes. This was much more pronounced and wide spread for the antisaccades than for visually triggered saccades. The peak negativity before movement onset for movement-aligned ERPs also covaried with RT suggesting no relation of this activity to movement preparation processes. This study then confirmed that only a particular ERP signal variation was related to the saccadic eye movement preparatory processes while other components of the ERP have no specific relation to the movement preparation. This particular signal was more prominent for antisaccades compared to visually triggered saccades supporting previous evidence for the cortical involvement in the preparation of these voluntary eye movements. In conclusion, this study validates the use of ERPs in the study of the planning and execution of saccadic eye movements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.