Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20709791›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2011

Moving Canadian governmental policies beyond a focus on individual lifestyle: some insights from complexity and critical theories.

C Alvaro, L A Jackson, S Kirk, T L McHugh, J Hughes, A Chircop, R F Lyons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Inequities in dietary intake and eating behaviours among adolescents in Canada.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Narrative Review and Analysis of the Use of "Lifestyle" in Health Psychology.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. How can care settings for people with intellectual disabilities embed health promotion?Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Obesity as a Disease.Current obesity reports · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

C AlvaroFaculty of Health Professions, Atlantic Health Promotion Research Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. celeste.alvaro@dal.ca
L A Jackson
S Kirk
T L McHugh
J Hughes
A Chircop
R F Lyons

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper explores why Canadian government policies, particularly those related to obesity, are 'stuck' at promoting individual lifestyle change. Key concepts within complexity and critical theories are considered a basis for understanding the continued emphasis on lifestyle factors in spite of strong evidence indicating that a change in the environment and conditions of poverty isare needed to tackle obesity. Opportunities to get 'unstuck' from individual-level lifestyle interventions are also suggested by critical concepts found within these two theories, although getting 'unstuck' will also require cross-sectoral collective action. Our discussion focuses on the Canadian context but will undoubtedly be relevant to other countries, where health promoters and others engage in similar struggles for fundamental government policy change.

Indexed as

Federal GovernmentHealth PolicyLife StyleCanadaEnvironmentHealth PromotionHumansObesitySocial Change

Identifiers

PMID20709791
PMCPMC3033735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.