Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20709693›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2010

ChEA: transcription factor regulation inferred from integrating genome-wide ChIP-X experiments.

Alexander Lachmann, Huilei Xu, Jayanth Krishnan, Seth I Berger, Amin R Mazloom, Avi Ma'ayan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 696 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
696citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

696 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1,102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Computational Network Analysis for Defining Transcriptional Programs.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cytotoxic activity of selinexor in BRAFActa neuropathologica communications · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

636 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander LachmannDepartment of Pharmacology and Systems Therapeutics, Systems Biology Center New York (SBCNY), Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Huilei Xu
Jayanth Krishnan
Seth I Berger
Amin R Mazloom
Avi Ma'ayan
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

System Biology Center in New YorkP50GM071558 · NIGMS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI IYENGAR, SRINIVAS RAVI V · 2007 to 2017
$22.8M
MOLECULAR MECHANISM OF DESENSITIZATIONR01GM054508 · NIGMS · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI IYENGAR, SRINIVAS RAVI V · 1995 to 2016
$8.0M
The Opioid mesolimbic system in heroin abuseR01DA015446 · NIDA · KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE · PI HURD, YASMIN L. · 2002 to 2018
$7.1M
Role of HIPK2 in Kidney Tubulointerstitial InjuryR01DK088541 · NIDDK · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI HE, JOHN CIJIANG · 2010 to 2019
$4.0M
A Chemical Biology Network for Personalized MedicineRC2LM010994 · NLM · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CARDOZO, TIMOTHY J, MA'AYAN, AVI · 2010 to 2010
$2.1M
Mount Sinai Institutes for Clinical and Translational SciencesKL2RR029885 · NCRR · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI MURPHY, BARBARA T. · 2009 to 2011
$1.8M
NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR029885NCRR NIH HHS KL2RR029885-0109NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015446NIDA NIH HHS R01DA15446NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK088541NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK088541NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM071558NIGMS NIH HHS P50GM071558-01A27398NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM054508NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM054508NLM NIH HHS RC2 LM010994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationExperiments such as ChIP-chip, ChIP-seq, ChIP-PET and DamID (the four methods referred herein as ChIP-X) are used to profile the binding of transcription factors to DNA at a genome-wide scale. Such experiments provide hundreds to thousands of potential binding sites for a given transcription factor in proximity to gene coding regions.

resultsIn order to integrate data from such studies and utilize it for further biological discovery, we collected interactions from such experiments to construct a mammalian ChIP-X database. The database contains 189,933 interactions, manually extracted from 87 publications, describing the binding of 92 transcription factors to 31,932 target genes. We used the database to analyze mRNA expression data where we perform gene-list enrichment analysis using the ChIP-X database as the prior biological knowledge gene-list library. The system is delivered as a web-based interactive application called ChIP Enrichment Analysis (ChEA). With ChEA, users can input lists of mammalian gene symbols for which the program computes over-representation of transcription factor targets from the ChIP-X database. The ChEA database allowed us to reconstruct an initial network of transcription factors connected based on shared overlapping targets and binding site proximity. To demonstrate the utility of ChEA we present three case studies. We show how by combining the Connectivity Map (CMAP) with ChEA, we can rank pairs of compounds to be used to target specific transcription factor activity in cancer cells. AVAILABILITY: The ChEA software and ChIP-X database is freely available online at: http://amp.pharm.mssm.edu/lib/chea.jsp.

Indexed as

Chromatin ImmunoprecipitationGene Expression RegulationSoftwareDatabases, GeneticGenomeTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID20709693
PMCPMC2944209
OpenAlexW2098023402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.