Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20709627›Full record

ReviewAgeing research reviews2011

Contemporary human genetic strategies in aging research.

Cinnamon S Bloss, Ludmila Pawlikowska, Nicholas J Schork

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ageing research reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Biogenetic mechanisms predisposing to complex phenotypes in parents may function differently in their children.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2013
    Article
  9. Genomics of human health and aging.Age (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2013
    Article
  10. Genes against aging.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2012
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cinnamon S BlossScripps Translational Science Institute & Scripps Health, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. cbloss@scripps.edu
Ludmila Pawlikowska
Nicholas J Schork

Funding

Systems BiologyU19AG023122 · NIA · TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INST · PI JODI A LAPIDUS · 2004 to 2026
$102.6M
SCRIPPS TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTE (UL1)UL1RR025774 · NCRR · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI TOPOL, ERIC JEFFREY · 2008 to 2011
$16.3M
Substance Abuse & Behavioral Disinhibition: Integrating Genes & EnvironmentU01DA024417 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI IACONO, WILLIAM G. · 2007 to 2010
$10.8M
TARGETING GENETIC PATHWAYS FOR BRAIN OVERGROWTH IN AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERSP50MH081755 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI COURCHESNE, ERIC · 2007 to 2013
$10.3M
Genomic Association Study of Bipolar DisorderR01MH078151 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI KELSOE, JOHN R. · 2007 to 2009
$5.5M
The Bipolar Genome StudyR01MH094483 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CRAIG, DAVID W, EDENBERG, HOWARD J · 2012 to 2014
$2.2M
Coherent AntiStokes Raman Scattering MicroscopeS10RR025447 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI LEI, TIM C · 2009 to 2009
$500k
Mitochondrial DNA Variation in Human Energy Expenditure and Metabolic RateR03AG032498 · NIA · CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MED CTR RES INSTITUTE · PI TRANAH, GREGORY J. · 2009 to 2010
$121k
CNS HIV ANTI-RETROVIRAL THERAPY EFFECTS RESEARCH /CHARTER/ -278022005-278022005N01MH022005 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CA -SAN DIEGO · PI GRANT, IGOR · 2003 to 2006
–
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR025447NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025447NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025774NIA NIH HHS 5U19AG023122NIA NIH HHS AG032498NIA NIH HHS U19 AG023122NIA NIH HHS U19 AG023122-01NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA024417NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA024417-01NIMH NIH HHS 1 R01 MH078151-01A1NIMH NIH HHS N01 MH022005NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH081755NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH081755-01NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH078151NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human aging is a complex, multifactorial process influenced by a number of genetic and non-genetic factors. This article first reviews genetic strategies for human aging research and considers the advantages and disadvantages of each. We then discuss the issue of phenotypic definition for genetic studies of aging, including longevity/life span, as well as disease-free survival and other endophenotypes. Finally, we argue that extensions of this area of research, including incorporation of gene×environment interactions, multivariate phenotypes, integration of functional genomic annotations, and exploitation of orthology - many of which are already initiated and ongoing - are critical to advancing this field.

Indexed as

PhenotypeAgingEvolution, MolecularHumansLife ExpectancyLongevityResearchTelomere

Identifiers

PMID20709627
PMCPMC3043164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.