ReviewSeminars in oncology2010
Epidemiological and clinical studies of nutrition.
Review in Seminars in oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Coffee consumption and risk of renal cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort evidence.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2022Pooled it
- The potential role of nutritional components in improving brain function among patients with Alzheimers disease: a meta-analysis of RCT studies.Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) · 2020Pooled it
- Increased Dairy Product Intake Modifies Plasma Glucose Concentrations and Glycated Hemoglobin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Pooled it
- Trial
- Fruits and vegetables intake and bladder cancer risk: a pooled analysis from 11 case-control studies in the BLadder cancer Epidemiology and Nutritional Determinants (BLEND) consortium.European journal of nutrition · 2024Article
- Analysis of the Consumption of Non-Oncological Medicines: A Methodological Study on Patients of the Ada Cohort.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Nutritional Composition and Health Benefits of Various Botanical Types of Melon (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Seaweed Components as Potential Modulators of the Gut Microbiota.Marine drugs · 2021Review
- Sodium butyrate protects against lipopolysaccharide-induced liver injury partially via the GPR43/ β-arrestin-2/NF-κB network.Gastroenterology report · 2021Article
- The complexities of the diet-microbiome relationship: advances and perspectives.Genome medicine · 2021Review
- Prostate cancer management: long-term beliefs, epidemic developments in the early twenty-first century and 3PM dimensional solutions.The EPMA journal · 2020Review
- Perspective: Advancing Understanding of Population Nutrient-Health Relations via Metabolomics and Precision Phenotypes.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
- Vitamin D, cancer, and dysregulated phosphate metabolism.Endocrine · 2019Review
- Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer.World journal of oncology · 2019Review
- Diet and Nutrition for Body Weight Management.Journal of obesity · 2019Article
- Lifestyle and bladder cancer prevention: no consistent evidence from cohort studies.European journal of epidemiology · 2017Article
- ImprovingJournal of oncology · 2017Review
- Diet, nutrition, and cancer: past, present and future.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2016Review
- Perspective: Randomized Controlled Trials Are Not a Panacea for Diet-Related Research.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2016Article
- Cancers in Australia in 2010 attributable to inadequate consumption of fruit, non-starchy vegetables and dietary fibre.Australian and New Zealand journal of public health · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In this review, we briefly summarize some of the key developments in nutritional epidemiology and cancer over the past two decades with a focus on the strengths and limitations of study designs and dietary assessment methods. We present the evidence on dietary fat, meat, fiber, antioxidant nutrients, and calcium in relation to carcinogenesis from large cohort studies and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and refer to the conclusions of the 2007 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research summary report. One prominent theme that emerged is the lack of concordance of results from RCTs and observational studies. There are multiple potential reasons for these discrepancies, including differences in study population, dose and timing of the exposure, adherence to an intervention, length of follow-up, and the primary endpoint. Therefore, null findings of RCTs do not necessarily indicate a lack of effect for the tested dietary factors on cancer risk, as some of these nutrients may have chemopreventive effects if given at the right time and in the right dose. It is likely that potential benefits from diet are due to a combination of food constituents rather than single components acting in isolation. Future efforts need to recognize the integrative nature of dietary exposures and attempt to study nutrients in the larger context of the foods and diets in which they are consumed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.